Where are all the lions? Study shakes concept of predator-prey ratios.

A researcher studying lions in Eastern and Southern Africa found a startling relationship between the availability of prey and the numbers of big cats. Surprisingly, that relationship is echoed in numerous other species.

|
Ben Curtis/AP/File
An old male lion raises his head above the long grass in the early morning, in the savannah of the Maasai Mara, south-western Kenya, July 7.

Why aren’t there more lions? 

That question fueled a science-shaking discovery about predator-prey ratios.

Double the prey does not mean double the predators, as one might expect. Instead, researchers found that an ecosystem crowded with prey held relatively fewer predators.

When Ian Hatton, a McGill University PhD student, began studying lions and their prey in protected parks in East and Southern Africa, he found himself looking for more lions. 

A veritable feast of gazelles bounded around and Zebras trotted freely – easy pickings for a pack of hungry lions. But there were fewer than Mr. Hatton expected. 

Upon further research, Hatton and the other scientists discovered that this was a pattern. Prey-crowded areas had fewer lions than expected. More prey did mean a few more lions, but the lions did not increase proportionally to the gazelle population, for example. 

When they examined studies on other animals, the researchers saw the same pattern. Large populations of prey did not lead to a significant increase of predators. 

This wasn’t limited to carnivores. The same pattern appeared among herbivores and the plants they eat.

“We kept being astonished,” study co-author Kevin McCann, of Guelph University’s Department of Integrated Biology, said in a news release. “This is just an amazing pattern.”

Researchers surmise that this pattern emerges because of prey reproduction rates. In crowded areas, prey reproduce at slower rates. Thus the prey population is made up of many healthy adults.

It’s easiest for predators to capture and kill younger prey or older, weaker prey. As such, a crowded population of prey that is reproducing at slower rates makes getting a meal more difficult for predators to find.

As this predator-prey relationship suggests, every species in the food chain influences others. In ecosystems that have lost an animal, dramatic changes have been observed.

Similarly, when an animal has been reintroduced to an environment, the balance has shifted for all living things. Those changes can affect many beings down the food chain. For example, when wolves were returned to Yellowstone National Park, more berries grew that bears could eat.

Also, lions were re-introduced to Rwanda in June as part of a conservation effort to return the ecosystem to its natural balance. The lion population had been demolished during recovery from the 1994 genocide.

In both of those cases, it was human impact that destroyed the predator population – be it wolf or lion. The case of Cecil the Lion’s death at the hands of an American dentist is just one instance of human influence, that sparked a global dialogue about humans’ role in the food chain. 

The pattern revealed by Hatton and the other researchers might help scientists better guide those discussions.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Where are all the lions? Study shakes concept of predator-prey ratios.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0904/Where-are-all-the-lions-Study-shakes-concept-of-predator-prey-ratios
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe