Subscribe
First Look

Did Stephen Hawking end decades-old debate on a black-hole paradox?

Stephen Hawking: The physicist offered a new theory that may help solve one of the most debated points in astronomy.

  • close
    Artist conception of a supermassive black hole highlights the accretion disk of gas and stars swirling around it. As well as the jets of material ejected along the poles.
    NASA
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

“If you feel you are in a black hole, don’t give up,” Stephen Hawking said to an audience at a public lecture in Stockholm, Sweden on Monday. “There’s a way out.”

Mr. Hawking was speaking to a group of mostly lay-people, in which he teased the idea that he may have another theory about black holes to bring to a close a 40 year-old debate known as the "black hole information paradox."

Black holes originate when massive stars collapse (or “die”) under their own gravity, creating a gravitational pull so strong that not even light can escape. Anything that falls into a black hole is believed to be destroyed by the immense gravity. But as New Scientist explains:

What you may not know is that physicists have been arguing for 40 years about what happens to the information about the physical state of those objects once they fall in. Quantum mechanics says that this information cannot be destroyed, but general relativity says it must be – that’s why this argument is known as the information paradox.

Before an audience of about three dozen foremost physicists at the Hawking Radiation Conference in Stockholm, Hawking said, "The message of this lecture is that black holes ain't as black as they are painted. They are not the eternal prisons they were once thought."

"Things can get out of a black hole both on the outside and possibly come out in another universe," Hawking said.

If his theory proves true, Hawking will have solved a mystery that he and his colleagues have been debating since Hawking famously posited and proved, in 1974, that black holes emit radiation.

Among the physicists in Stockholm, there is already some doubt.

“I wouldn’t say the solution to the information paradox has been found because there are several competing ideas,” said Carlo Rovelli, physicist at the Aix-Marseille Universite in France, and an attendee, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. “But Stephen being Stephen, everybody’s going to take it seriously.”

The Journal also notes that Gerard 't Hooft of Utrecht University, winner of the 1999 Nobel Prize in physics who was also at the conference, had presented a similar idea in 1996.

"I claim he is now where I was 20 years ago," he told the Journal. "If he announces this as a new idea, I won't be thrilled."

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK