Americans optimistic about flying cars, not so much about robot caregivers

A Pew survey of 1,000 Americans asked to predict the future showed a lot of optimism but also considerable skepticism about where technology may be leading us.

|
Amazon/AP
A Prime Air vehicle carries a package during an Amazon test of a drone delivery system. Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos says he hopes to have a program in which Amazon delivers packages via drone up and running within five years.

Maybe just the tiniest sliver of possibility of someday having to bow to robot overlords plays into why Americans are uncomfortable about some futuristic prospects, including using human-like robots to care for the elderly.

On the other hand, according to a new Pew study that quizzed Americans about their views and predictions about the future, the world according to “Back to the Future” – flying cars, even time travel – is exciting to a majority of people. Indeed, 59 percent of respondents say technological change will ultimately make life better, compared to 30 percent who believe it could make life worse.

“The American public anticipates that the coming half-century will be a period of profound scientific change, as inventions that were once confined to the realm of science fiction come into common usage,” writes Pew senior researcher Aaron Smith.

The study, done in cooperation with the Smithsonian, is part in fun, but also contains some prescriptions for technology companies working the leading edge of the technologically possible.

A large majority of American believe custom organ transplants are possible within 50 years, but another majority – 63 percent – believes that a future filled with drones buzzing the sky is not desirable.

Americans are also skeptical about the future of “wearable” computers, like Google’s beta version of Glass. Fifty-three percent say people being constantly fed digital information through their senses is not a good thing.

“For Google, which has struggled to make its Glass computerized eyewear socially acceptable, for Amazon, which has floated the possibility of delivering packages by drone, and for other companies banking on the future, the survey's findings suggest that research budgets should be matched by investments in public relations,” writes Thomas Claburn, in Information Week. “The future may be bright but people are more comfortable with the present.”

Indeed, majorities of Americans say certain strands of research give them the heebie-jeebies.

For example, 66 percent say society would take a turn for the worse if would-be parents could tweak the DNA of their offspring to create little super humans.

About an equal percentage say life would change for the worse if society allows lifelike robots to become primary caregivers for the elderly.

Researchers found that the more money a respondent makes, the more optimistic about the impact of future technologies they are.

Americans also seem to have a healthy skepticism about what’s really possible. Only thirty-three percent say scientists will perfect a teleportation device in the next 50 years, and a mere 19 percent believe humans will be able to control weather by 2064. Thirty-three percent believe they’ll live in a world where humans have colonized other planets.

About 1 in 10 Americans strike a Luddite stance, claiming there are no futuristic inventions they’d like to own. At least they can’t think of one right now.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Americans optimistic about flying cars, not so much about robot caregivers
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/0419/Americans-optimistic-about-flying-cars-not-so-much-about-robot-caregivers
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe