Arab countries join Japan in fight against bluefin tuna ban

Several Arab countries joined Japan in opposition to ban export of Atlantic bluefin tuna.

By , AP

  • close
    Several Arab countries on Wednesday signaled support of Japan's opposition to an Atlantic bluefin tuna ban. In this photo, a wholesaler carries a frozen tuna between tuna laid out in rows at Tsukiji fish market, Japan's largest fish auction house, in Tokyo.
    View Caption

Opposition grew Wednesday against a proposal to ban the export of Atlantic bluefin tuna, with several Arab countries joining Japan in arguing it would hurt poor fishing nations and wasn't scientifically justified.

Other countries including Australia and Peru have expressed support for a weakened proposal which is expected to be introduced Thursday at the 175-nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, or CITES.

They want the trade regulated for the first time by CITES but not banned outright as demanded by conservationists who contend the Atlantic bluefin is on the brink of extinction.

Recommended: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

Killing or even weakening the tuna proposal would be a setback for CITES, which has made the protection of marine species a key goal during this two-week meeting. A proposal for a shark conservation plan was also defeated on Tuesday.

Many poor countries appeared to be leaning toward protecting their economies over conserving the iconic tuna.

"Most Mediterranean countries are afraid because they export this tuna," said Ahmed Said Shukaili, a delegate from the Persian Gulf country of Oman, whose nation will follow the Arab League position opposing the ban.

"They see this as an economic issue," he said. "There is a lot of concerns for the fishermen who depend on this fish."

Japan says it has the support of China while several other countries were undecided. China has not said publicly where it stands.

Monaco — the sponsor of the proposed ban on the export of Atlantic bluefin tuna — says numbers have fallen by nearly 75 percent since 1957. But most of the decline has occurred over the last decade with demand driven by sushi lovers in Japan and elsewhere for the bluefin's succulent red and pink meat.

Supporters of the ban, including the European Union and the United States, say it is necessary because the Atlantic bluefin is a migratory species that swims from the western Atlantic to the Mediterranean — putting it beyond any one country's border.

Compounding the tuna's plight is the growing threat from illegal fishing fleets and the failure of existing measures to keep the population sustainable.

"The North African countries are concerned about fishermen losing their jobs. But nevertheless the jobs will be lost when there will be no more bluefin tuna," said Patrick Van Klaveren, a delegate with the Monaco delegation. "With bluefin tuna, it's not a question of 10 or 20 years but five or six years or less to see the stock collapse."

Raw tuna is a key ingredient in traditional dishes such as sushi and sashimi, and the bluefin variety — called "hon-maguro" in Japan — is particularly prized.

Japan, which imports 80 percent of Atlantic bluefin and has led the opposition to the ban, argued on Wednesday that CITES should have no role in regulating tuna and other marine species. It said that it is willing to accept lower quotas for bluefin tuna but wants those to come from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, or ICCAT, which currently regulates the trade.

Masanori Miyahara, chief counselor of the Fisheries Agency of Japan, told The Associated Press that CITES was "unfair and partial" and that a tuna ban would allow the Europeans and Americans to continue fishing tuna domestically while Japan suffers from a steep drop in exports.

"The big players will continue fishing," Miyahara said. "If necessary, let's stop fishing using ICCAT measures. Then everyone must give up the fishing. But here, it is very unfair."

Critics, however, argue that ICCAT consistently ignores its own scientists in setting quotas and does little to stop countries from exceeding already high quotas or cracking down on widespread illegal fishing.

Susan Lieberman, director of international policy with the Pew Environment Group in Washington, said there was a lot of confusion over the competing proposals and even how the ban would impact certain countries. There is also disinformation campaigns by some governments that have implied, for example, that North Africa would suddenly be inundated with tuna boats from the Mediterranean if the ban took hold, she said.

Still, Lieberman remained optimistic that a proposal would be passed — though it could take many forms from an outright ban, to a delayed ban to increased trade restrictions with some kind of quotas.

"What we are seeing is broad support for CITES having a role in Atlantic bluefin tuna," Lieberman said.

Share this story:

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...