Subscribe
First Look

BP oil spill dispersants hindered oil-eating microbes, study says

Chemical dispersants used to help breakdown the BP oil spill actually hindered microbes that were helping clean-up the huge slick, says new research. 

  • close
    PJ Hahn, Coastal Zone Manager for Plaquemines Parish, examines oil along the shoreline of Bay Jimmy, which was heavily impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, in Plaquemines Parish, La., Friday, Sept. 27, 2013.
    (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Chemical agents dropped from a plane on the 2010 BP oil spill in  the Gulf of Mexico removed oil from the water's surface but did not help fully degrade it, a new study indicates.

The research, led by scientists at the University of Georgia, shows that the dispersants actually suppressed oil-eating bacteria and slowed their ability to degrade oil. 

After the 210-million-gallon spill from the Deepwater Horizon, the chemical agent Corexit 9500 was applied from air onto the oil slick to help it degrade and aid natural bacteria in the water remove the oil faster.

The maritime area affected appeared to be getting cleaner, but scientists and government officials didn't monitor the bacteria and chemicals, according to lead study author, Samantha Joye, a marine scientist at University of Georgia.

During the research, scientists recreated the conditions of the BP oil spill in the lab, closely monitoring the effects of Corexit 9500 on oil slicks and the microbes that feed on them.

Corexit 9500 didn't lower the presence of all microbes. The chemical agent significantly increased the presence of a family of microbes called colwellia. However, they are not as good at eating oil, Dr. Joye said.

"The fact that dispersants drove distinct microbial community shifts that impacted oil degradation efficiently came as a big surprise," Joye, said in a press release. "It is critical to quantify the factors that influence the efficiency of oil biodegradation in the environment, and that includes dispersants."

"During the spill, Marinobacter were not abundant in deep-water plume samples, possibly as a consequence of dispersant applications," said study co-author Sara Kleindienst, junior group leader at the University of Tübingen in Germany. "Whether natural hydrocarbon degraders were outcompeted by dispersant degraders or whether they were directly affected by dispersant-derived compounds needs to be resolved in future studies."

Joye suggests that much of the oil may still be on the floor of the gulf.

In July, BP agreed to pay $18.7 billion – paid out over 18 years – to settle all government claims that have arisen from the massive spill, which killed 11 workers and destroyed businesses and marine life.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK