Subscribe

There are basically two big forests left, say scientists

Researches funded by the Natural Science Foundation have found that the Earth is left with two large forests, with all remaining wooded areas being relatively fragmented, and growing more so. 

  • close
    This 2005 photo provided by the US Fish and Wildlife Service shows Jarbidge River floodwaters eroding part of the South Canyon Road near Jarbidge in northeastern Nevada. Increased forest fragmentation over the decades has had profound impacts on all forms of wildlife.
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/File/AP
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

The world's forests are becoming more and more isolated. 

So much so that the only two remaining continuous forests are in the South America and Africa, and they are strikingly larger than any other tree-covered area visible via satellite imagery, according to an international team of 24 scientists, who published their findings in the journal Science Advances.

“There are really only two big patches of intact forest left on Earth — the Amazon and the Congo — and they shine out like eyes from the center of the map,” lead author Nick Haddad, a professor at North Carolina State University, told the New Yorker. 

The forests that remain are relatively fragmented. Almost twenty percent of forested land lies roughly the length of a football field away from its edge; almost 70 percent of forested land is within half a mile of the forest's edge.

This fragmentation takes a huge toll on living things. The team found that fragmented habitats lose, on average, half of their plant and animal species within 20 years.

"Once a forest disappears, the resulting area is more exposed and experiences greater extremes of temperature, humidity, and wind – all of which negatively influence plants and animals in nearby forest”, says Doug Levey, Program Officer with the National Science Foundation and co-author of the paper. "Furthermore the forest community becomes threatened by invasion of numerous non-native species that typically inhabit disturbed, open habitats.” 

Part of what made this study so comprehensive was the longevity of some of the experiments, Dr. Levey said. When landscapes are disrupted by humans, it’s notoriously difficult to attribute negative impacts only to fragmentation; many other factors may also play roles in the decline of plants and animals in the remaining habitat. The advantage of the experiments conducted for this study was that they were designed to isolate fragmentation effects from all other types of effects. Furthermore, they were conducted in many places, by many researchers, and for generally long times.  "No matter the scale, habitat or, organism the effects of fragmentation were universally bad," Levey said.

The paper highlights the fact that effects of fragmentation are only visible over a prolonged period of time. One possible way to slow down fragmentation's effect on forest habitats is to connect nearby clumps of forest and create a corridor of trees to connect those clumps, says Levey. 

"It's never too late to preserve what we already have," he says, "People have known for a long time that fragmentation is bad and it's getting worse."  

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK