Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

For town made famous by 'Erin Brockovich,' a toxic sequel?

Hinkley, Calif., battled pollution of its ground water by chromium 6 in the 1990s – a case that inspired 'Erin Brockovich.' Now the substance has escaped its containment barrier.

By Chris RichardContributor / January 4, 2011

Roberta Walker stands near a well on her property in Hinkley, Calif. The community, depicted in the film ‘Erin Brockovich,’ has chromium 6 in its ground water – the result of contamination decades ago by Pacific Gas and Electric. Ms. Walker, a plaintiff in the action depicted in the film, used her settlement to build a new home.

Greg Vojtko/Special to The Christian Science Monitor

Enlarge Photos

Hinkley, Calif.

This past Christmas may have been Karen Dodd's last chance to be Santa Claus.

Skip to next paragraph

Each year, Ms. Dodd reads the letters to Santa from the children on her mail route and grants their wishes, dropping off their gifts with a North Pole return address.

A Hinkley, Calif., native, she's saved the notes, planning to return them to the children when they grow up. But the future of this Mojave Desert community is uncertain.

Hinkley – made famous by the movie "Erin Brockovich" for the triumph of ordinary people over industrial polluters – faces a toxic sequel. The plume of hexavalent chromium that was at the heart of the movie has slipped past a containment barrier, complicating efforts to make the community's water safe.

Pacific Gas and Electric caused the contamination in the 1950s and '60s, when it used chromium 6, as it's also called, to fight rust in cooling towers, and then stored chromium-tainted water in unlined ponds. The substance leaked into Hinkley's ground water. By the early '90s, PG&E started buying up and demolishing homes in Hinkley.

Remediation efforts have brought down the contaminant level substantially, but some tests still show levels above the safety limit that state officials have set for Hinkley. After PG&E's well tests last year indicated that the plume was shifting, the company announced in December that it had offered to buy 130 more properties at the edge of the plume – most of them along Dodd's route.

"I feel horrible about it," she says. "This has always been home, and it's disappearing."

How dangerous is chromium 6?

Scientific and legal debate has raged over the risk posed by hexavalent chromium in drinking water since the 1990s, when Erin Brockovich, then an obscure legal file clerk, unearthed evidence that the substance had leached into Hinkley's ground water. Residents sued, and in 1996, PG&E paid a $333 million settlement to about 600 people who blamed exposure to chromium 6 for high rates of cancer and other diseases.

While many researchers say that hexavalent chromium is an inhalation carcinogen, some have claimed that the risks are negligible when the substance is ingested. But in 2009, National Toxicology Program (NTP) scientists reported that their research "clearly demonstrates" that the compound is a carcinogen in drinking water.

The American Chemistry Council counters that the rats in the NTP study were subjected to unreasonably high chromium exposures. It's sponsoring additional research.


Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story