Subscribe
The Monitor's View

An opening for peace in Afghanistan?

National reconciliation

After a US drone killed the Taliban leader, a new leader emerges whose background suggests he might not oppose peace talks with the Afghan government. All countries involved in possible negotiations must pursue this possibility – especially Pakistan.

  • close
    Taliban new leader Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada is seen in an undated photograph, posted on a Taliban twitter feed on May 25, 2016, and identified separately by several Taliban officials, who declined be named.
    Reuters
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Americans were starkly reminded last week that their military’s role in Afghanistan is far from finished, nearly 15 years after the 9/11 attacks. A US drone strike killed the leader of the Taliban, Akhtar ­Mohammad Mansour. While the strike may seem aimed at a military defeat of the insurgent group, it was not. Rather, Mr. Mansour was targeted for being an obstacle to peace talks – and to the hopes for national reconciliation.

This is why his replacement, Moulavi Haibatullah Akhunzada, is drawing so much interest. As head of the Taliban’s group of religious scholars – rather than a military commander – he may have a different temperament toward the prospect of peace. And as the group’s longtime clerical leader, he could bring greater authority in persuading other Taliban leaders to start negotiations with the Afghan government.

That possibility, while currently slim in the eyes of many experts, must not be ignored by the nations of the Quadrilateral Coordination Group – Afghanistan, China, Pakistan, and the United States. This group has tried for three years to launch peace talks for Afghanistan.

Its efforts are based on the belief that the only and best way to resolve the conflict in Afghanistan is through negotiation and a peace process. Despite the Afghan Army’s improved performance on the battlefield under a recently elected government, a military victory over the Taliban seems remote.

To start the negotiations, however, Pakistan must finally implement its stated policy of opposing all violent extremists on its territory, not just those that strike its own people. The US was able to locate Mansour as he traveled openly in Pakistan before hitting him with a drone. While the strike was an embarrassing intrusion on Pakistani sovereignty, it revealed how little the Taliban worries about the Pakistani intelligence service.

China, as a close partner of Pakistan, has a peculiar interest in the Afghan peace process. It is spending billions on roads, railways, and other infrastructure to link its economy with countries to its west. It will need stability in the “Af-Pak” region to build what it calls a new “Silk Road.”

With President Obama planning to draw down US troop levels to a residual force of 5,500 by the time he leaves office early next year, the Taliban have an incentive to negotiate a peaceful role for the group in Afghan society. The obstacles to peace are not worth more war.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK