Remodeling democracy, 800 years on

Global surveys show rising distrust of traditional democracy, and many institutions. Yet other indicators suggest young people want different types of civic engagement. The media must probe beyond the politics of conflict.

|
AP Photo
Sarah Morgan, 14, loads grapefruit as she and other volunteers spend a Saturday morning, Jan. 24, gleaning fruit from citrus trees in Jacksonville, Fla. as a part of Feeding Northeast Florida's Citrus Harvest for the Hungry. The volunteers fanned out to harvest fruit from an estimated 265 trees from 165 homes.

This year marks the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta, Latin for “Great Charter.” The document, sealed by King John in 1215, helped launch the long struggle for democracy and civic rights around the world. Yet by many measures, traditional democracy – at least the kind spread widely in the 20th century – appears to be in trouble, leading some experts to ask if democracy itself is changing. 

Consider these recent surveys: 

For the ninth straight year, political rights and civil liberties across the globe have declined, according to Freedom House’s annual report. In 2014, democracy was under its greatest threat in the last quarter century in places such as Egypt, Thailand, and Russia. Another survey, called AmericasBarometer Study, found a precipitous drop of trust in elections in 26 countries in the Americas, from Chile to Canada.

Globally, public trust in government, business, media, and nongovernmental organizations “evaporated” last year, according to a survey of 33,000 people by the Edelman public relations firm. For the first time, nearly two-thirds of the 27 nations surveyed fell on the “distrustful” side of the Edelman Trust Barometer. Surprisingly, trust in NGOs fell for the first time.

In the United States, a federal survey shows a steady decline in 16 of 20 indicators of “civic health.” Fewer Americans, for example, say it is important to report a crime. In the last elections, only slightly more than one-third of eligible voters cast ballots.

Support for democracy remains high around the world. But, says political scientist Hendrik Wagenaar of the University of Sheffield, “Satisfaction with the performance of their own democratic system does not tally with citizens’ political aspirations.”

Professor Wagenaar, like many scholars, wonders if people are searching for new forms of civic association based on shared values and beliefs, often local in nature or through digital communities. 

“They feel that ‘official democracy,’ the democracy that the media report on, does not do well in addressing these concerns, let alone solving them,” he writes. “People haven’t abandoned politics, but politics, they feel, has abandoned them.” He cites cases in Europe of citizens coming together to organize “social goods” in voluntary attachments, such as in sustainable energy, rural transport, or access to the Internet. They create ties of mutual dependency outside of government. 

“Most people want to engage with democracy,” he states. “But not the democracy of political parties, powerful lobbying organizations, and the spectacle of politicians arguing about a political agenda that is not theirs. Citizens care for responsibility, respect and a measure of control. It is astonishing to see how ordinary people are then able to master complexity, resolve conflict and arrive at creative solutions.”

In the US, one measure of this shift is seen among those under age 30 (Millennials). Unlike other Americans, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll, they have a much lower commitment to traditional civic duties such as voting, jury duty, or following the news media. Yet this age group does cite one civic activity, volunteering, as a “very important obligation.”  

One in 5 adults under 30 volunteered in 2013, up from 14 percent in 1989, according to census data. But where are they volunteering? Other data show a decline in activity for traditional institutions that rely on volunteers.

All this hints at the need to rethink “civic health” and ways of measuring it. After eight centuries of gains in democracy, the forms may be changing, yet the spirit probably remains – individuals gathering together as equals around a common affection for the public good. A new great charter may need to be sealed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Remodeling democracy, 800 years on
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2015/0129/Remodeling-democracy-800-years-on
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe