Righting wrongs in China depends on rights

Dissident Chen Guangcheng is speaking out about the need for rule of law in China. But the party is slowly accepting individual rights. And studies show those few rights are yielding positive results.

|
Bobby Yip/Reuters
Election workers burn remaining unused ballots before vote counting at a polling station in Wukan village in Guangdong province February 1. The vote selected an independent election committee to oversee ballot counting for an election of a village committee.

Famed dissident Chen Guangcheng has been in the United States less than two weeks, and he’s already firing off complaints in the US media about his country’s leadership. His main criticism: China doesn’t lack for good laws but only needs to enforce them.

The Communist Party does indeed govern more by fiat and whim than by rule of law. The reason is simple. The party has a low regard for individuals to self-govern. As a result, laws come from the party, not elected representatives of all the people, and thus can be ignored.

Yet there is a glimmer of hope. The party has been forced over the years to grudgingly recognize some rights for the individual, either in governance or in owning property. In fact, new evidence from scholars about the effects of such rights may convince the incoming crop of new leaders this fall that an expansion of individual liberty is China’s best path for continuing prosperity.

One study by four researchers published this month by the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that the steady introduction of elections in rural Chinese villages has reduced income inequality, created an acceptance of higher taxes, and increased spending on public goods at the local level by 27 percent.

Elections of village “chairmen” have been steadily allowed since the early 1980s, when reformers in Beijing realized that China was too big for the party to keep check on corrupt party leaders in every hamlet. Only the local people could do that.

At first, however, the party chose the candidates. But in the past 15 years, many candidates were nominated by villagers.

The result is better accountability of local leaders to the people.

The average age of a village chief has become younger while the education level has gone up. Party members are often not the preferred choice. Greater trust of local government has allowed taxes to be raised, the study found. Farmland is more equitably distributed, reducing the income gap between rich and poor.

“Elections can help voters address moral hazard problems by rewarding good performance with re-election ... and provide the correct incentives to office holders,” states the report, which also speculates whether such results might help spur “wider regime change.”

Indeed, since 2009 the party in a few cities such as Nanjing and Shanghai has conducted experiments in letting party members elect local party leaders. 

Another recent study looks at the effects of granting property rights in housing. Since the mid-1990s, millions of state employees working in state-run enterprises have been given the right to buy the homes provided them and, more important, to sell them.

The shift was the largest change in private-property rights in history, affecting some 90 million people. One result is that China now has one of the highest rates of homeownership in the world.

With communism no longer an organizing principle for China, the party has been forced to look for ways to justify its rule. Merely letting people get rich hasn’t been enough. Now the rising middle class is demanding more political rights.

Some top leaders, such as outgoing Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, have spoken out for reform. But reform will likely be gradual, with recognition of the small steps already made.

As China’s great market reformer Deng Xiaoping advised, China must cross the river by feeling for stones. Well, the stones are now easily known. It’s time to cross the river quickly.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Righting wrongs in China depends on rights
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2012/0530/Righting-wrongs-in-China-depends-on-rights
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe