Subscribe

Readers write: Dominance of English, problems with nuclear race

Letters to the editor for the Aug. 15, 2016-Aug. 22, 2016 weekly magazine.

  • close
    Men work at the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station site near Bridgwater in Britain.
    Darren Staples/Reuters
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Dominance of English

Regarding the June 13 cover story “The new battle of Britain”: Great reporting, but I assume that the story did not mention English as the world’s lingua franca because no one is talking about it. It’s the elephant in the room, after all. The symbolism of Britain leaving the EU is anti-world – essentially, “We’ve had all we can take of global integration.”

The world has embraced English (at gun-point) as the language that can help everyone to explain their issues, if not resolve them. “Brexit” is an invitation for those who don’t want to resolve differences to back off, and for those who love war to keep on fighting.

Alan Krause

Arlington, Va.

Problems with nuclear race

Regarding the June 13 article “Nuclear-capable nations are growing their weapon systems, report finds” (CSMonitor.com): It neglects to mention two major problems with the qualitative race that is now taking place among the world’s nine nuclear-armed nations. First, it is clearly illegal under international law, which requires good-faith negotiations on an end to the nuclear arms race. That is why the Marshall Islands has filed lawsuits against all nine nuclear-armed nations at the International Court of Justice and, separately, against the United States in US federal court, for breaches of this obligation. 

Second, the “modernization” programs these countries are engaged in are often giving nuclear weapons new military capabilities. In many cases, weapons that are being “modernized” right now are planned to still be in use until late in the 21st century. The B61-12 nuclear gravity bomb, currently being “modernized” by the US, will become the world’s first “smart” gravity bomb, with a new guided tail-fin kit and an adjustable explosive yield. These new capabilities could make the weapon more usable in the eyes of military leaders, leading to consequences that are truly unthinkable.

Rick Wayman

Director of programs, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation

Santa Barbara, Calif.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK