Subscribe

Readers write: An economic environmental plan, the politics of immigration

Letters to the editor for the Feb. 16, 2015 weekly magazine

  • close
    In this July 2013 photo, smoke rises from the Colstrip Steam Electric Station, a coal burning power plant in Colstrip, Mont. The Obama administration is set to limit carbon emissions from US power plants.
    Matthew Brown/AP
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

An economic environmental plan
Regarding the Jan. 23 online article “What are Republicans going to do about climate change?” (CSMonitor.com): A majority of Americans want action on emissions reduction, and Republicans will have to come up with a plan they can get behind.

A plan they should consider is carbon fee and dividend, supported by former Secretary of the Treasury George Shultz and other prominent conservative leaders, because the revenue, collected from mining and drilling operations, does not go to the government. Also known as a revenue-neutral carbon tax, CFD returns all revenue to households in the form of monthly dividend checks like the dividends all Alaskans currently enjoy from oil drilling on public land. A 2014 economic modeling study by the well-respected REMI (Regional Economic Models Inc.) showed that such a plan would dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions over a 20-year period while creating 2 million new jobs and boosting the Main Street economy.
 Lynn Meyer
Bayside, N.Y.
 

Politics of immigration plan
Regarding the Jan. 14 online article “House GOP blocks Obama immigration plan, but there’s an asterisk” (CSMonitor.com): Advocating open borders and amnesty doesn’t make someone a liberal – else how to explain the millions poured into the effort by the Chamber of Commerce, the agribusiness and corporate service sector lobby, indeed every business association pursuing cheap labor. Supporting amnesty doesn’t make one a progressive, and opposing it is often done in the interest of America’s working poor.

Recommended: GOP Congress: 5 energy priorities

The article also makes far too much of the Hispanic vote. It was minimal in 2008 and still more minimal in 2012. The real issue is whether the 6 million white working-class voters that sat out the 2012 election will defend their jobs by voting Republican, ideally with a slice of the black working-class tired of having yet another group leapfrog over them.
Stephen Steinlight
Senior policy analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies
New York

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK