Back to school – and new common standards?
So far, 47 states have signed on to the 'common core state standards' launched by the National Governors Association in 2009. The standards ensure uniformity in what's taught in every classroom nationwide. But we need follow-through at the local level. Here's what you can do.
Democracy is like herding cats – and so is education reform. As America’s public schools consider new common standards in subjects such as math and language arts, it’s time to act on these standards while the cats are all in the same room.Skip to next paragraph
Gallery Monitor Political Cartoons
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
So far, 47 states have signed on to the “common core state standards” launched in 2009 by the National Governors Association. The standards would ensure uniformity in what’s taught in every classroom and what’s expected of every student nationwide. Each grade level would work toward the same goals, instead of experiencing educational chaos – thousands of different goals and curricula.
But even an extraordinary commitment such as this – which also has the backing of the two main teachers unions as well as Republicans and Democrats from Main St. to Pennsylvania Ave. – can disappear when the chalk hits the chalkboard. It can face resistance, indifference, or simply fall beneath other priorities.
That’s why we need to turn our attention to teachers, parents, and other community leaders and get the buy-in needed at the micro level.
Without clear, consistent standards, America’s schools will remain adrift and many of its students lost at sea. Consider an example in Kentucky.
A few years back, a Kentucky school district had 167 different mathematics curricula being taught in its 152 schools. Instead of clear goals and consistent content, there was a mathematical free-for-all. That’s what’s been happening in too many of our country’s schools for far too long.
Some argue that the common core standards would discourage teacher creativity and dumb down requirements. I disagree. Identifying a set of requirements that all students could count on attaining would instead strengthen accountability and provide a clear educational map for all students.
Consider the consequences of not acting and maintaining the status quo. Since 1980, the educational gap between low-income students and their higher income peers has grown wider every year, as measured by standardized test scores, high school graduation, college-going and college-graduation rates. Continuing on this course is the equivalent of “national suicide,” as columnist David Brooks put it in The New York Times last month.
The common core standards would level the playing field and show that low-income children matter. Those Kentucky students – and children from thousands of other school systems nationwide – would all be taught the same content in algebra and calculus, and even better, they would build the foundation in earlier grades for algebra, considered a gateway to academic rigor and college success.