Car insurance: Liability or comprehensive coverage?

When shopping for car insurance, you have two basic coverage options: liability coverage and comprehensive coverage. Can't decide which is best for you? Trent Hamm offers this advice to help you choose the right insurance.  

By , Guest blogger

  • close
    Sonia Hernandez-Bridwell works in a Progressive car insurance office. Hamm explains the difference between liability and comprehensive car insurance.
    View Caption

When you’re shopping for car insurance – something that’s a legal requirement in most areas when you own a car – one of the biggest questions that comes your way is whether or not you should have liability coverage or comprehensive coverage on your automobile. Liability coverage is usually cheaper, but comprehensive coverage covers more. Which is the right answer?

First, let’s look at what each type covers.

Liability coverage does not cover any damage to your own vehicle in the case of an accident. What it does cover is any damage done to other vehicles that you’re legally obligated to cover. For example, if you’re in a traffic accident where you are at fault and you damage another car, liability insurance kicks in. Liability coverage doesn’t typically have a deductible, meaning that if you have to use the insurance, nothing will come out of your pocket.

Recommended: Car logos quiz

Comprehensive coverage goes beyond liability insurance. It covers the damage done to other vehicles, but it also covers damage done to your own vehicle, not just from traffic accidents, but from many natural sources. If your car is damaged in a storm, for example, comprehensive coverage kicks in. When you make a claim on comprehensive insurance, however, there is usually a deductible, meaning you have to pay for some of the damage out of pocket. Remember, though, that liability coverage is usually a part of comprehensive coverage – you get the liability coverage described above along with the coverage of your own vehicle. 

Obviously, the monthly cost for liability coverage is going to be less than the monthly cost of comprehensive coverage. So, the real question is whether or not the additional benefits of comprehensive coverage are worth it.

For me, the question comes down to this: if your car were completely totaled, could you afford to pay off any remaining debt on it out of pocket as well as buy yourself a comparable car to replace it?

If you think about that question for a bit, it becomes pretty clear that liability works best in some cases and comprehensive works best in other cases.

For example, if you’re driving an old car that’s fully paid for, liability coverage is probably the best option. You’re likely looking at auto failure in the next several years anyway, so an accident would just cause that failure to happen earlier. Also, considering that the deductible on the insurance would add up to a significant part of the value of your car, even a claim on the insurance wouldn’t save you much money.

Also, if you have paid for any car and have a significant emergency fund, liability coverage is probably better. In this case, the difference between the monthly cost of comprehensive and liability insurance is significant. If you would be able to shoulder the cost of a vehicle replacement out of your pocket due to significant savings, I’d probably skip the comprehensive insurance.

Another situation that might push you toward liability insurance is easy access to mass transport. If you use your car rarely and will be able to function without it for a while, comprehensive coverage may be unnecessary for you.

For most other situations, comprehensive is probably a better choice.

For example, if you still owe a significant amount of money on your current automobile and you total it out, you’re still liable for that money plus you’ll need the resources to acquire another car. That can be a significant amount of money needed very quickly.

Also, most people do not have large enough emergency funds or cash reserves to simply go buy another car in a very short time frame. Many people are able to simply get a car loan, but even then, you’re putting yourself in a debt situation.

A final note: the savings of liability insurance should be yet another call to get your financial house in order. If you are in a situation where you don’t have a significant emergency fund and are living paycheck to paycheck, the potential crisis that would arise from a devastating car accident can be troublesome and is likely pushing you toward comprehensive insurance. Without that pressure, liability looks like a better option and it has a lower monthly cost.

What about us? Right now, we have liability insurance on our older vehicle and comprehensive on our newer one, but we’re on the verge of switching them both to liability. This means lower monthly costs for us compared to running comprehensive insurance on both. We’re able to make that choice because we’re careful in other financial areas and have a very healthy emergency fund.

The post Car Insurance: Is Liability or Comprehensive Coverage Right for Me? appeared first onThe Simple Dollar.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on www.thesimpledollar.com.

Share this story:
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...