Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


The Daily Reckoning

What's the plan for America's gold stash?

The government owns gold. But how much, and where, and just what they plan to do with it, are all questions no one seems to to answer.

By Rocky VegaGuest blogger / November 2, 2010

This 2006 file photo shows gold bars on display at the 'Gold' exhibit at New York's American Museum of Natural History. As gold reaches historic new highs, questions arise about the government's stash of bullion. Should we sell it? Hoard it? Use it to pay down the debt? The bigger question, perhaps, is why the government doesn't want to answer any of these inquiries.

Seth Wenig / AP / File

Enlarge

In November’s new issue of The Atlantic, James Picerno poses the question of why, given such lean times, “is $300 billion worth of government treasure simply sitting in vaults?” He’s referring to the US stash of gold reserves. Although there are a number of good reasons for the status, it’s interesting to consider what reasons the federal government is willing to offer publicly.

Skip to next paragraph

The Daily Reckoning

Recent posts

From The Atlantic:

“Getting straight answers (or any answers at all) from Washington about our hoard of gold is weirdly difficult. Yes, the government can downsize its holdings, said Congressman Brad Sherman, a member of the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology, through a spokesman. No, it’s not a good idea, he added, offering no elaboration. When I called to interview the subcommittee’s chairman, Representative Mel Watt, his office begged off in an e-mail, advising only that he ‘hadn’t studied this particular issue as of yet.’

“Repeated calls and e-mails to the White House press office went unanswered. The Treasury Department referred me to the section on gold in the U.S. Code. When I pressed for more information, a public-affairs official e-mailed back: ‘Gold? Don’t you have anything better to write about[?]‘

“…Under current law, income from the sale of gold must be used to reduce the national debt. But nothing would stop Congress from rewriting the regulation to permit other uses. By Washington’s corpulent spending standards, $300 billion may seem modest, but it’s hardly trivial: it could, for example, reduce our $1.3 trillion budget deficit by more than 20 percent; finance Social Security for nearly six months; or fund unemployment benefits for several years—in effect, create a stimulus package without pushing us further into debt.”

It seems rather obvious the last thing the feds would do is spend the cash on paying down the national debt while failing to consider any austerity measures. Instead, the recommendations above for simply spending gold – especially rather than cutting expenses — are of dubious value. Alongside the US military, the gold reserve is probably one of the nation’s not-yet diminishing assets that still insulate the US’ dwindling credibility as home of the world’s reserve currency.

You can read the full details in The Atlantic’s coverage of Uncle Sam’s mysterious hoard.

Add/view comments on this post.

------------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.