Supposed to be Standard, more often just Poor
How responsible were rating agencies for the financial crisis?
Rating agencies have rightly shouldered much of the blame for the financial crisis, and yet the world still looks to them for guidance on sovereign debt. For example, the Euro, which has now dipped under $1.30, owes part of its lost value to recent credit rating agency (CRA) downgrades of Greece, Portugal and Spain. These countries are clearly mismanaging their national budgets, but given the recent history of CRA blunders it feels a bit ironic to trust them in particular to tell us when a country’s in trouble.Skip to next paragraph
The Daily Reckoning
Addison is editorial director of The Daily Reckoning and executive publisher of Agora Financial, LLC, a fiercely independent economic forecasting and financial research firm. He’s a three-time New York Times best-selling author whose work has been recognized by The New York Times Magazine, The Economist, Worth, The New York Times, The Washington Post, as well as major network news programs.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
From Fund Strategy:
“Once again, the federal negotiators were begging to be anointed. Imagine going to a religious figure who has been defrocked and asking for absolution!
“A year later, as sovereign debt risks emerge as the latest danger, investors anxiously await credit rating agencies’ (CRAs) position on the debt of Greece, Britain or even America. It is a paradox. Despite an abysmal track record in recent years, those agencies still wield unrivalled power and influence. They remain the only game in town, as regulatory reforms advance at a glacial pace. This discussion attempts to sketch out some of the thorniest areas crying for reform, and then to suggest a few solutions.
“First, the agencies’ business models are riddled with conflicts of interest, says Richard Herring of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Although the agencies had originally sold manuals with credit assessments to investors, by the 1970s they had switched to a model whereby issuers paid them instead. Herring describes the mixed incentives of the diverse constituencies: ‘Issuers want the highest rating they can obtain, and prefer to conceal or sugarcoat adverse information to keep their borrowing costs low.’”
Countries like the US and UK right now — when compared to the PIIGS — seem like less urgent risks. Yet, the major debate surrounding US debt remains the increasing risk of a credit downgrade. The world is still at the mercy of credit rating agencies that have more than proved their fallibility. Given the circumstances, we wouldn’t put it past US regulators to find an excuse to take them over.
If you’re interested in learning more, you can visit Fund Strategy to read about the ”second rate.”
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.