Subscribe

Donald Trump’s tax proposals could double the trade deficit

Republican presidential contender Donald Trump often expresses dismay about the US trade deficit, which he ties to the loss of good paying middle class jobs. The issue is more nuanced than Mr. Trump suggests.

  • close
    In this Aug. 12, 2016 file photo, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump gives a thumbs up as he leaves a campaign rally in Altoona, Penn.
    Evan Vucci/AP
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Republican presidential contender Donald Trump often expresses dismay about the US trade deficit, which he ties to the loss of good paying middle class jobs.  The issue is more nuanced than Mr. Trump suggests, and his plan to impose giant tariffs on China and other countries won’t create jobs or even necessarily reduce the trade deficit.  Even more damaging, his tax proposals could double our trade deficit from $500 billion to as much as $1 trillion at current income levels.

Economists have long recognized that there is a relationship between trade deficits and budget deficits.  The country must produce or import everything it consumes.  In particular, if government spending and business investment exceed tax revenues and domestic saving, the excess must be imported.

If domestic saving and investment don’t change, then every dollar increase in the budget deficit would translate into another dollar of trade deficit.  That is the “twin deficits” hypothesis. However, government policy can change levels of saving and investment. For example, households may choose to save part of a net tax cut. Or more government borrowing may push up interest rates, which would crowd out some private investment.  Both effects would tend to offset some or all of the increase in the budget deficit. 

Recommended: Trump's reality TV playbook: Seven ways it changed 2016 election

In the 19th century, economist David Ricardo posited that private saving might offset deficit increases dollar for dollar if far-sighted individuals save to prepare for the inevitable future tax hikes caused by those deficits. Ricardo himself didn’t believe that people behave that way and the proposition isn’t supported by evidence, but it’s a theoretical possibility.

There is, however, evidence that the two deficits move together.  A careful study by two IMF economists estimated that, on average, an additional dollar of budget deficit translates into 60 cents of additional trade deficit. The Tax Policy Center estimated that Trump’s initial tax plan would increase budget deficits by 2.8 percent to 5.5 percent of GDP between 2017 and 2026. That would raise the trade deficit by 1.7 percent to 3.3 percent of GDP. Thus, by 2026, trade deficits could be roughly double their recent levels (2.7 percent to 3.0 percent of GDP between 2011 and 2015).

Trump has since withdrawn his original tax proposal and now suggests he may adopt some version of the plan House Speaker Paul Ryan proposed last June. Trump II, as we understand it, would still add trillions to the deficit because it would cut tax rates dramatically, especially on business income, without significantly broadening the tax base or cutting spending.  (We plan to publish updated estimates of the Trump plan, including macroeconomic feedback effects, in mid-September.)

Trump advisors say that his new tax plan remains a work in progress.  If Mr. Trump really cares about the trade deficit, he should start with a fiscally responsible tax plan. 

This story originally appeared on TaxVox.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK