Correcting Krugman: Setting the record straight on Latvia labor
In response to recent comments by US economist Paul Krugman, Karlsson clarifies and explains the concept of labor mobility, along with its potential for lowering unemployment rates across the eurozone region.
Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman speaks during an interview in New York in this May 2012 file photo. Krugman recently said that Latvia's drop in unemployment is due to emigration, an assertion Karlsson strongly disagrees with.
Brendan McDermid/Reuters
Responding to the recent recovery in Latvia, Paul Krugman tries to dismiss it by saying the recent drop in unemployment is due to emigration, and while he writes that labor mobility isn't bad, it's not a model for all of Europe, because "somehow having all of Europe move to someplace else in Europe doesn’t quite seem like a sustainable proposition".
Skip to next paragraph
Recent posts
-
05.21.13
How monetary inflation leads to consumer price inflation -
05.20.13
Could UK claim title of Europe's biggest economy? -
05.09.13
Germany's declining population gets sudden immigration boost -
05.07.13
Do high stock prices mean economic inequality? -
05.03.13
Jobs report: why the economy isn't as strong as you think
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Well, if you phrase it in the stupid way Krugman did, then it makes no sense. But no one is suggesting that all of Europe should move somewhere else in Europe. What does make sense however is if unemployed workers in for example Greece, Spain or Latvia move to countries where their skills are wanted by employers. This will (except perhaps in the construction sector which is a special case for reasons I explained here) reduce unemployment in the countries of origin of these workers And large parts of Europe, most notably the German-speaking countries Germany, Austria, Liechtenstein, Switzerland and Luxembourg but also Norway and Åland, have low unemployment and are likely having labor shortages in some sectors.
This doesn't mean that increased labor mobility, even outside of the construction sector, will alone come even close of solving all problems in Europe, but while the effect wouldn't be very big it would still be positive.
Finally, it should be noted that Krugman is wrong to assert that the drop in unemployment in Latvia is entirely or even mainly due to emigration. The main cause is an increase in the employment rate by about 7% (4 percentage points) since the low in early 2010, and the drop in population reflects to a large extent the effects of the dramatic drop in Latvia's birth rate in the early 1990s something that for obvious reasons means that there will be a lot fewer youngsters in their late teens by now.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. This post originally ran on stefanmikarlsson.blogspot.com.
Follow Us