Another Krugman fallacy: High-priced commodities do crimp demand

Rising commodity prices may not derail the recovery, but they do dampen demand – and hurt the United States.

  • close
    In this July file photo in a field near Coy, Ark., an ear of corn is partially exposed on the stalk before harvest. Corn prices hit a two-year high this summer as questions remained about the available supply of the crop. Higher commodity prices do crimp demand.
    Danny Johnston/AP/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

While Krugman casts others as being "worst economist in the world", he does his best to try to earn that title for himself.

 

"Higher commodity prices will hurt the recovery only if they rise in real terms. And they’ll only rise in real terms if QE succeeds in increasing real demand. And this will happen only if, yes, QE2 is successful in helping economic recovery.

What this official is saying is a version of the classic freshman mistake: an increase in demand leads to higher prices, and higher prices make people buy less, so an increase in demand leads to lower sales.

Amazing stuff, and further evidence of the Dark Age of economics now descending."


First of all, while it is true that higher commodity prices won't necessarily derail the recovery, it will to an uncertain (it could be partially, fully or more than fully) extent prevent higher nominal demand caused by quantitative easing from causing an increase in real demand and real output. This goes both for the general increase in prices as well as the terms of trade loss discussed below.

And what he misses is that since commodity prices are a lot more flexible than most consumer and producer prices, it is all but certain that quantitative easing will in the short term raise commodity prices disproportionately, or in other words raise real commodity prices.

And while that will benefit commodity exporters like Australia, Russia and Brazil, that will by creating a terms of trade loss hurt net commodity importers like the United States.

------------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. This post originally ran on stefanmikarlsson.blogspot.com.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK