Jeep recall: Chrysler refuses, then caves to feds' call for inspecting 2.7 million Jeeps

Jeep recall of 2.7 million vehicles at risk for catching fire during collisions was finally agreed to by Chrysler. The company intially refused when the NHTSA requested the Jeep recall, even though the issue has been linked to 51 deaths. 

|
Carlos Osorio/AP/File
Rows of 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokees are lined up outside the Jefferson North Assembly Plant in Detroit in 2001. Chrysler announced Tuesday, June 18, 2013 that it will issue a Jeep recall of older Grand Cherokee and Liberty SUVs that could be at risk of a fuel tank fire. In early June 2013, the company refused the NHTSA's request to recall the Jeeps.

After initially refusing, Chrysler has agreed to comply with a formal government request to recall 2.7 million model Jeeps. According to regulators, the Jeep recall will include Cherokee and Liberty models that can catch fire due to the position of the gas tank behind the rear axle.

The problem has already been responsible for 51 deaths resulting from Jeeps igniting after rear-end collisions, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The recall involves Jeep Grand Cherokees made between 1993 and 2004, as well as Jeep Libertys manufactured between 2004 and 2007. The affected vehicles will be inspected and, if necessary, have a trailer hitch installed to protect the gas tank. Chrysler didn’t say how much the hitches would cost the company.

“As a result of the agreement, Chrysler Group will conduct a campaign with respect to the vehicles in question that, in addition to a visual inspection of the vehicle will, if necessary, provide an upgrade to the rear structure of the vehicle to better manage crash forces in low-speed impacts,” Chrysler said in a statement.

Chrysler’s pushback to the NHTSA’s request was unusual, to say the least. Vehicle recalls are requested and complied with constantly, often for problems far more minor than exploding gas tanks. More often than not, an automaker will issue a recall before it’s formally requested.

The NHTSA sent a formal letter to Chrysler outlining the concerns leading to  the recall earlier this month, saying that  it believed that “the MY [model year] 1993-2004 Grand Cherokee and MY 2002-2007 Liberty contain defects related to motor vehicle safety,” and requesting that “Chrysler initiate a safety recall of these vehicles.”

But Chrysler, while not refusing the government’s claims, maintained that its own internal data showed no signs of undue risk. “The company does not agree with NHTSA’s conclusions and does not intend to recall the vehicles cited in the investigation,” Chrysler’s official response read.

Chrysler was widely expected to formally refuse the recall request Tuesday afternoon, Instead, it reversed course and complied, but was still maintaining previous assertions that the vehicles are safe.

“Chrysler Group’s analysis of the data confirms that these vehicles are not defective and are among the safest in the peer group,” a company statement read. “Nonetheless, Chrysler Group recognizes that this matter has raised concerns for its customers and wants to take further steps, in coordination with NHTSA, to provide additional measures to supplement the safety of its vehicles.”

Had Chrysler refused, the NHTSA could call for court hearings and additional investigations, and eventually ask the Justice Department to sue Chrysler to force a recall. Vehicles can’t be recalled more than 10 years after the model’s first sale. The last time an automaker refused a recall was Ford in early 2011.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Jeep recall: Chrysler refuses, then caves to feds' call for inspecting 2.7 million Jeeps
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2013/0618/Jeep-recall-Chrysler-refuses-then-caves-to-feds-call-for-inspecting-2.7-million-Jeeps
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe