Three indie bookstores file lawsuit against Amazon and Big Six publishers
The stores charge that secret agreements made between the publishers and Amazon give Amazon the advantage in selling e-books, but some industry observers find flaws in their logic.
(Page 2 of 2)
In addition to damages, the three indie bookstores also want an injunction which would “prohibit ... Amazon and the Big Six from publishing and selling e-books with device and app specific DRMs and further require ... the Big Six to allow independent brick-and-mortar bookstores to directly sell open-source DRM e-books.”Skip to next paragraph
'Game of Thrones': Catch up with the characters via this season four trailer
Mindy Kaling will reportedly write follow-up to her bestselling book 'Is Everyone Hanging Out Without Me?'
Pastor reportedly buys his way onto New York Times bestseller list
'Paddington' movie trailer glimpses at children's book series bear
Goldman Sachs elevator tweeter loses book deal
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Simon & Schuster representative Adam Rothberg told The New York Times, “We believe the case is without merit or any basis in the law and intend to vigorously contest it. Furthermore, we believe the plaintiff retailers will be better served by working with us to grow their business rather than litigating.”
As industry newsletter Shelf Awareness pointed out, the lawsuit is somewhat baffling because the six publishers require digital rights management on e-books no matter who’s selling them – including indie bookstores selling e-books for the Kobo device. In addition, the bookstores state that only e-books sold to users by Amazon will work on Kindle devices, which is not the case – users can read e-books from other sellers on their Kindles. (Transferring books from a Kindle to another device is tricky, though the technically savvy may be working on a solution not sanctioned by the companies.)
Another confusing point, wrote Shelf Awareness, is that while the bookstores charge that "the vast majority" of readers purchase e-books from Amazon, they fail to point out that Kobo, the company that produces the device sold by indie bookstores, also sells e-books obtained from the Big Six publishers.
In addition, Cory Doctorow, a writer for the blog Boing Boing, points out that the bookstores incorrectly used the term “open source” to describe what they want, which is e-books that would work across e-readers. “Open source” is defined as a computer program whose original code is made available to users, allowing them to change the program.
“For some reason, they're using ‘open source’ as a synonym for ‘standardized’ or ‘interoperable,’” Doctorow writes. “Which is to say, these booksellers don't really care if the books are DRM-free, they just want them locked up using a DRM that the booksellers can also use. There is no such thing as ‘open source’ DRM – in the sense of a DRM designed to run on platforms that can be freely modified by their users.... I wish they'd actually bothered to spend 15 minutes trying to understand how DRM works and what it is, and how open source works, and what it is, before they filed their lawsuit.”
The suit from the three independent bookstores follows after the Department of Justice sued several major publishers, stating they had worked with Apple to make e-books more expensive. Hachette, Simon & Schuster, Penguin, Macmillan and HarperCollins all agreed to settle, leaving Apple as ithe only defendant in the suit. The trial is scheduled for June.