Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Does the literary world need a women-only prize?

The Rosalind Prize for Fiction – named for Shakespeare's 'As You Like It' heroine – follows awards like Australia's women-only Stella Prize and the U.K.'s Orange Prize.

(Page 2 of 2)

(Ironically, notes the U.K.’s Guardian, the prize is named after the same Stella Miles Franklin whose bequest launched the Australia’s most prestigious literary award, the Miles Franklin, which in recent years has come under attack for being a “sausage fest.” According to the paper, just 13 of the award’s 50 winners have been women. The Stella Prize, then, is something of a challenger to the established Miles Franklin.)

Skip to next paragraph

Recent posts

Both the Stella and the Rosalind awards were inspired, in part, by the U.K.’s Orange Prize, now known as Women’s Prize for Fiction, a literary award established in response to the 1991 all-male shortlist for the Booker Prize. Since its inauguration in 1996, that prize, say advocates, has helped push women writers into the mainstream.

Responding to critics who say the prize is exclusive and creates unhealthy gender categorization, Zawerbny told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, “This prize that celebrates women's fiction doesn't create a pink ghetto, I think it's completely the opposite. I actually think such a prize is inclusive because it brings women into the fold, it brings them into the mainstream.”

As for those who think the prizes are unnecessary, consider these statistics, provided by novelist Susan Swan for the CBC:

 – In the 108-year history of the Nobel Prize for Literature, only 12 women have won. (In other words, women represent just 11 percent of Nobel Prize winners.)

 – Only 35 percent of Man Booker Prize winners have been women.

 – Only five women have won the Stephen Leacock Memorial Award for Humor since it was established 65 years ago.

And according to Gillian Jerome of Canadian Women in the Literary Arts, roughly equal numbers of men and women get published in Canada. But women are less likely to have their books reviewed and less likely to win literary prizes – a third-less likely in each case, in fact.

“You see those stats and you’re like, this is so widely disproportionate; it almost can’t be true,” Zawerbny told the Globe and Mail. “Because you think we’ve evolved ... But we haven’t in many ways.”

The Rosalind, Stella, and Orange Prize are the answer, says Zawerbny and others like her.

What do you think – does the literary world need women-only prizes to level the playing field and bring attention to literature by women? Or is this a misguided and outdated move?

Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.


  • Weekly review of global news and ideas
  • Balanced, insightful and trustworthy
  • Subscribe in print or digital

Special Offer


What are you reading?

Let me know about a good book you've read recently, or about the book that's currently on your bedside table. Why did you pick it up? Are you enjoying it?

Doing Good


What happens when ordinary people decide to pay it forward? Extraordinary change...

Danny Bent poses at the starting line of the Boston Marathon in Hopkinton, Mass.

After the Boston Marathon bombings, Danny Bent took on a cross-country challenge

The athlete-adventurer co-founded a relay run called One Run for Boston that started in Los Angeles and ended at the marathon finish line to raise funds for victims.

Become a fan! Follow us! Google+ YouTube See our feeds!