On the 50th anniversary of "To Kill a Mockingbird": a glimpse of Harper Lee
Harper Lee biographer Charles J. Shields talks about Harper Lee and the 50th anniversary of her masterpiece "To Kill a Mockingbird."
(Page 2 of 2)
Oh, yes. He wrote to Detective Dewey with whom he became friends in Kansas while working on “In Cold Blood” and said that Harper Lee, or Nelle [the name used by Harper’s family and friends], “has a book coming out and you must get it. It has a character named Dill in it and that’s me.” He was very much in favor of anything that shone the spotlight on [himself].Skip to next paragraph
End to an era at legendary Paris bookshop Shakespeare and Company
'Daughter of Smoke and Bone' film rights acquired by Universal
Better World Books' bestseller list: more classics than new titles
More books, more choices: why America needs its indies
Is Slate's Amazon-defending blogger really a 'moron'?
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Why did the longtime friendship between Lee and Capote eventually sour?
It was jealousy on Truman’s side, disappointment on Nelle’s side. Here was this next-door neighbor of his who never craved fortune or the spotlight and she wins the Pulitzer Prize. So it was jealousy on his side and disappointment on Nelle’s because Truman drifted into a sea of drugs and alcohol and became an undependable friend.
Why didn’t she succeed at producing another book?
I think that you write best when you are passionate about something, and that book was sort of a gift to her father. Her father was disappointed that she had dropped out of law school and gone to New York to be a bohemian. He really envisioned her helping build the Lee dynasty in [their hometown]. She wanted that book to work and she wanted her father to be a hero. And she achieved that. [Also] her support group fell away. And then I think alcohol got in the way.
You describe Lee as a boisterous, brave child. But she seems so retiring as an adult. Has she changed?
I think that Nelle Harper Lee is a very authentic person who has never looked over her shoulder for anyone’s approval. From the time that she was a little girl she stood her ground on the playground and said her piece. This business about being retiring, I think that celebrity was a shock to her. When she became famous, she realized that she had really traded off her freedom and that was not really something that she was willing to give up.
Fifty years after its publication, “To Kill a Mockingbird” remains one of the most well-loved and influential books in American literature. What is the source of its power?
First of all, it’s just a darned good story. There will always be a place on library shelves for books that have a wonderful fictional landscape that we all can enter into. I know people who read “To Kill a Mockingbird” annually as a treat to themselves because they want to go back to Maycomb. Then, secondly, it deals with one of the great challenges facing all humanity, which is getting along with people who are different from ourselves. The last reason the book is going to remain a classic is that it does what all great literature does: It reads you as you read it. It asks you what are your convictions, what do you stand for, could you do what Atticus did? You can’t help but think to yourself, “What would I do if that were laid at my feet? Could I stand up and do the right thing?”
Harper Lee never wrote another book. How do you think she feels about her own career?
[Lee] is at heart a provincial woman from a small town who probably would not have written that book except for the fact that she went to New York and saw the great diversity of people there and how they lived with each other, how day in and day out almost all of them get along. I think that she’s grateful that the scales fell from her eyes and that she found a story, a great story to tell, that was larger than even the one that she thought originated in her own small town. She wanted [to write] something about her dad, she wanted something about Monroeville, and what she ended up with was a statement about what it means to be human. And I think she’s probably pretty grateful.
Marjorie Kehe is the Monitor's book editor.