2008: A good year for fiction?
It was and wasn't – depending on how you look at it. A story in USA Today, after an analysis of 2008 bestseller lists, announces that, "2008 ... was a good year, not just for ['Twilight' vampire series author Stephenie] Meyer, but for fiction."Skip to next paragraph
End to an era at legendary Paris bookshop Shakespeare and Company
'Daughter of Smoke and Bone' film rights acquired by Universal
Better World Books' bestseller list: more classics than new titles
More books, more choices: why America needs its indies
Is Slate's Amazon-defending blogger really a 'moron'?
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The piece points out that novels dominated bestseller lists last year. Each week, 69% of the top 150 books on USA Today's bestseller lists were novels. The story notes that that is the highest percentage of novels in top slots since 1993.
But was it really a good year for both fiction and Meyer – or just a good year for Meyer? If you subtracted sales of her books from the list it would be quite a different story. According to USA Today, Meyer's books accounted for "one in every five books sold since Thanksgiving."
And if then you took away sales of books by Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling (who managed to briefly knock Meyer off the top of the list with her "The Tales of Beedle the Bard"), fiction sales would be looking far, far less impressive.
Then again, it does depend on how you look at it. You could make a pretty strong argument that 2008 was a fine year for fiction for all the following reasons:
– There were SO many good short story collections (to name just a few: "Unaccustomed Earth" by Jhumpa Lahiri, "Olive Kitteridge" by Elizabeth Strout, "The Boat" by Nam Le, "Ms. Hempel Chronicles" by Sarah Shun-Lien Bynum)
If you took the sales of all these books together (even including "Edgar Sawtelle" and "A Mercy") I don't know how they would stack up beside Stephenie Meyer.
But if you can overlook the numbers, that still seems to me to be a good year for fiction.