‘The Fraud’ pokes at Victorian-era biases – and our own

|
Ben Bailey-Smith
Zadie Smith is the author of "The Fraud."
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

Novelist Zadie Smith turns her sharp eye to historical fiction in “The Fraud,” which centers on a notorious 1870s trial of an Australian butcher who claimed to be Sir Roger Tichborne, heir to a family fortune in England.

At stake in this novel, which is drawn from actual events, is the matter of identity.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Amid rising concerns about disinformation and bias, Zadie Smith’s colorful and historical characters shed light on the roots of our biases.

“The Fraud” is told largely from the viewpoint of Eliza Touchet, an uncommonly strong, sharp-tongued observer. Widowed early after a miserable marriage, Eliza is wonderfully vivid and modern – certainly not your stereotypical Victorian. Bisexual, fervently abolitionist, and a “natural cynic,” she is a single woman who craves independence.

What makes the novel so compelling is the way Eliza grapples not just with the suggestibility of most people, but also with her own biases and limitations, such as her “tendency to believe what she most needed to be true.” Her determination that “false beliefs are precisely the ones we tend to cling to most strongly,” is one of many aspects of “The Fraud” that bears particular resonance today.

Zadie Smith turns her sharp eye to historical fiction in “The Fraud,” which centers on a notorious 1870s trial of an Australian butcher who claimed to be Sir Roger Tichborne. Sir Roger was heir to a family fortune in England, and he was thought to have been lost in a shipwreck years earlier. At stake in this novel, which is drawn from actual events, is not just the Tichborne family wealth, but also the matter of identity. “Who are we?” is a question that underlies much of Smith’s work, beginning with “White Teeth,” her spectacular 2000 debut.

Smith deftly weaves rich source material, including trial transcripts, into a lively though never straightforward narrative, making it clear why she was drawn to this Victorian-era cause célèbre. One of the documents she quotes, by the defending attorney’s daughter, characterizes the mania that ensued over the case as “a species of moral tornado” that “excited every sort of human passion.”   

Smith puts her bemused imprint on the proceedings. “The Fraud” encompasses issues of class, bias, race, and money as “a material form of freedom,” how we separate truth from falsehood, and what we can really know about other people.  

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Amid rising concerns about disinformation and bias, Zadie Smith’s colorful and historical characters shed light on the roots of our biases.

In a brilliant move, “The Fraud” is told largely from the close third-person viewpoint of Eliza Touchet, an uncommonly strong, sharp-tongued observer. Widowed early after a miserable marriage, Eliza became a housekeeper and housemate for her cousin, William Harrison Ainsworth, a prolific, popular mid-19th century novelist whose friends included William Thackeray, George Cruikshank, and Charles Dickens.  

Ainsworth (1805-1882) published 41 books in his lifetime – none of which remain in print. His most famous, the sensational 1839 crime novel, “Jack Sheppard,” actually outsold Dickens’ “Oliver Twist” – until the murder of an aging aristocrat in 1840, thought to be a copycat crime, raised questions about the damaging influence of violent entertainment. (Claire Harman reconsiders the case in “Murder by the Book: The Crime That Shocked Dickens’s London,” published in 2019.)

Eliza is a wonderfully vivid and, in many ways, modern character, certainly not your stereotypical Victorian. Bisexual, fervently abolitionist, and a “natural cynic” with strong misgivings about the source of much of England’s wealth, she is a single woman who craves independence more than anything else. 

Smith clearly has fun fleshing out what little is known about Eliza’s relationship with her cousin. William, an uncommonly sweet and submissive man, was “constitutionally unable to disappoint anyone,” she writes. But, she adds, “No one had ever accused William of being backward about putting himself forward.” 

Eliza considers most of William’s fiction, set in the distant past, unreadable nonsense, including his latest “Jamaican novel,” set in a place he knows nothing about. She wonders why William doesn’t focus on contemporary stories, like George Eliot does. Smith has a fine time quoting and satirizing Ainsworth’s work, filled with laughable lines like “‘Zounds!’ he mentally ejaculated.” 

“The Fraud” jogs back and forth – sometimes confusingly – between the 1830s and the 1860s. In the early years, after the death of William’s first wife, Eliza was the de facto lady of the house, hosting dinners for William’s eminent literary colleagues. In the 1860s, she is displaced by Sarah Wells, an illiterate former maid who becomes the second Mrs. Ainsworth after bearing her boss, nearly 40 years her senior, a daughter. At first reluctantly, Eliza accompanies Sarah, who is besotted with the Tichborne case, to the trial. 

Ever the critic, Eliza finds the proceedings overstuffed with too much irrelevant information, “like reading a novel by William.” And, although embarrassed by the uneducated girl’s excited whoops during the spectacle, she comes to recognize the astuteness of some of Sarah’s primal reactions.  

Eliza is so deeply impressed (if not entirely swayed) by the dignified, unswerving testimony for the defense by Andrew Bogle, the formerly enslaved longtime manservant of the late Baron Tichborne, that she takes him to tea. His family’s story, rife with the horrific realities of slavery in Jamaica, is embedded in the second half of “The Fraud,” spanning nearly 100 powerful pages.

This isn’t the first time Smith has found inspiration in British literature and woven a variety of auxiliary documents into her fiction. Her third novel, “On Beauty” (2005), used E.M. Forster’s Edwardian masterpiece, “Howards End,” as a template for an exploration of privileged people’s responsibility to share their advantages with the less fortunate. She touches on some of these moral issues again in “The Fraud.” 

But what makes Smith’s latest novel so compelling is the way Eliza grapples not just with the suggestibility of most people, “with brains like sieves through which the truth falls,” but also with her own biases and limitations, such as her “tendency to believe what she most needed to be true.” Her determination to be “gentle and mindful of Sarah’s hurt feelings, always remembering that false beliefs are precisely the ones we tend to cling to most strongly,” is one of many aspects of “The Fraud” that bears particular resonance today.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to ‘The Fraud’ pokes at Victorian-era biases – and our own
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/2023/0904/The-Fraud-pokes-at-Victorian-era-biases-and-our-own
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe