9 sports books for holiday reading and giving

If you like variety, these 2017 sports releases offer an abundance of that.

7. ‘The California Golden Seals: A Tale of White Skates, Red Ink, and One of the NHL’s Most Outlandish Teams,' by Steve Currier

The National Hockey League’s foray into California occurred in 1967 when the Los Angeles Kings and California Golden Seals took up residence in the state. The Kings are now a well-established franchise with two Stanley Cups on their resume. The Golden Seals are long gone, having never gained traction during a mostly torturous 1967-to-1978 run, when the franchise finally bit the dust after moving to Cleveland. In less than a decade, the team had four ownership groups, none of which had a grip on how to put together a winning team or draw fans. How the franchise managed to lose money and games in spades with questionable personnel and marketing decision fills the pages of hockey historian Steve Currier’s account of this largely forgotten team. 

Here’s an excerpt from The California Golden Seals:

“Though oddball promotions often made the Seals and their owner look like a joke, there were perks that came with working for [Charlie] Finley. When he was in a good mood, Charlie loved spreading the wealth. After the Seals beat Boston 2-1 on November 15, [1970] Finley was so delighted he bought each player a $25 steak dinner and a $200 suit. Marshall Johnston, who played for the Seals from 1971 to 1974 and coached the team afterward, remembered Finley fondly. One time in New York, Johnston recalls, ‘[Finley] took us all down and bought us all Gucci [alligator] shoes, and he bought us all bright green jackets one year, and we all had nice luggage … we were the only team that flew first class, and that was something innovative that was a long time before charters came in and things like that. You know, on a six-hour flight from San Francisco to New York, it was kind of nice.’

“The problem with Finley was that he believed players would respond positively to green luggage and matching suits, but in reality all the players wanted was for money to be spent on improving the team.”

7 of 9

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.