Thousands of writers pen letter denouncing Trump: Will it matter?

Authors added their name to a petition denouncing Donald Trump's campaign in the final days before he secured the delegate votes to clinch the Republican nomination.

|
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a news conference in Bismarck, N.D., on Thursday.

Thousands of writers in the literary community have banded together to protest the potential presidency of Donald Trump, who officially clinched the Republican nomination on Thursday.

Authors Andrew Altschul and Mark Slouka penned the letter on the literary website Lit Hub on Tuesday, quickly picking up signatures after the endorsement of famous authors like Stephen King, Cheryl Strayed, Dave Eggars, Junot Díaz, Amy Tan, Jennifer Egan, and Tobias Wolff. After reaching 100 signatures on Tuesday, momentum snowballed, and within 48 hours more than 10,000 people had signed, reaching 17,232 by mid-afternoon Thursday.

The petition lists eight reasons that "we, the undersigned, as a matter of conscience, oppose, unequivocally, the candidacy of Donald J. Trump for the Presidency of the United States," including that "as writers, we are particularly aware of the many ways that language can be abused in the name of power," and because the candidate "deliberately appeals to the basest and most violent elements in society, [and] encourages aggression among his followers, shouts down opponents, intimidates dissenters, and denigrates women and minorities." 

The corresponding Twitter account @WritersOnTrump has tracked the campaign's progress:

Authors have also taken to their own Twitter accounts to tweet their support for #WritersOnTrump, including Cheryl Strayed, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller "Wild":

However, some have expressed skepticism that the letter will actually have any impact on political discourse, even though they may agree with the sentiments expressed.

Alyssa Rosenberg from The Washington Post compares the Lit Hub letter to the larger competition in entertainment between reality TV and classic literature. And just like literature's "long, losing war against TV," the writers' letter against Donald Trump will likely fail, she says.

"I hope that voters will decide this fall that there is a difference between being entertained and being governed, but I don't count on it," Ms. Rosenberg wrote on Wednesday. "It's fashionable, and a bit shallow, to decry the rise of television in general and reality television in particular relative to literature as a sign of some sort of moral and intellectual downfall. But the challenges literature faces in trying to compete with popular entertainment have rarely felt so consequential."

But Mr. Altschul tells CNN Wednesday that he felt like he had to do something.

"There is a real sense of helplessness in watching what is happening in our country and watching the rise of a figure in our politics who really is like nobody we have ever seen before as the nominee of a major political party," said Altschul, "and we both felt – Mark and I – that even if we couldn’t do anything at the political level, we couldn’t sit back and not try to make our opinion known and have some effect if that were possible."

The online petition's popularity parallels a victory for Mr. Trump's campaign Thursday, when the real estate mogul officially became the Republican presidential nominee with 1,238 pledged delegates.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Thousands of writers pen letter denouncing Trump: Will it matter?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/2016/0526/Thousands-of-writers-pen-letter-denouncing-Trump-Will-it-matter
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe