6 baseball books for the 2015 season’s stretch drive

Here are recent releases for those eager for good late-season baseball reads.

3. ‘Pedro,’ by Pedro Martinez and Michael Silverman

Really now, how many baseball players could get away with writing an autobiography using just a first name as a title? Pedro Martinez figured he could do so. After all, he won three Cy Young Awards as his league’s best pitcher, and entered the Hall of Fame this summer. Coming out of the Dominican Republic as a scrawny prospect, few could have imagined him achieving such success. But Martinez was fiercely determined, had a whip-like delivery that produced great ball movement, and was not afraid to pitch inside. “Pedro” follows his rise from playing as a boy using primitive equipment to the peak of his professional career, spent with the Boston Red Sox between stops with four other teams. 

Here’s an excerpt from Pedro:

“As a pitcher, a start for me began each time my last one ended."

“I would let my body recover for a couple of days – no throwing, just running. On a treadmill tucked into the home clubhouse at Fenway, I’d jog along to my Dominican music and watch, with the sound off, video of a succession of pitchers our video coordinator, Billy Broadbent, had dug up for me. I was more interested in what worked for other pitchers than in what worked for the hitters, so I would look for recent film of pitchers whose style was similar to mine and who also threw hard – Tim Hudson, Johan Santana, Roger Clemens – and see how they had fared against the team I’d be facing next."

“It didn’t matter if a hitter was a lefty or a righty, it was simply a question of speed: could he catch up to my fastball? If a hitter was going to be late against the fastballs from any of those three pitchers, he would be late against mine too."

3 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.