Baseball fans: Take a quick tour of all 30 major league ballparks

Authors Josh Pahigian and Kevin O’Connell explore America's major league ballparks in "The Ultimate Baseball Road."

27. Toronto Blue Jays/Rogers Centre

AP

Opened: 1989

Capacity: 49,539

What the authors say: “Inside Rogers the atmosphere resembles that of older-generation domes like the Metrodome and Kingdome, but on a much grander scale.”

Learned from the book:

• The SkyDome, the original name of this mammoth structure, was such a sight to behold that a 4 million fans annually attended games in the early years (helped, of course, by a  team that won back-to-back World Series in 1992 and 1993). The stadium’s cachet was soon lost when Baltimore started the retro stadium craze in 1992.

• It takes 20 minutes to open the domed roof (slow by today’s standards). Although watching the transformation is spectacular from any perspective, the authors are partial to the overhead view from the CN Tower right next door.

• At this point, the Blue Jays are the only team with an infield that is mostly covered in artificial turf. The only dirt visible is rectangles around each of the bases.

• It would probably be unfair to call the Rogers Centre a white elephant, but clearly its value has dropped considerably. It cost $578 million to build the dome, but in 2005 it was sold to Rogers Communications for a mere $25 million.

• Depending on who you believe, Roger Clemens was injected with steroids in one of the hotel rooms that overlooks the field.

• The Rogers Centre is far taller than Houston’s Astrodome – 31 stories compared with 18 stories.

• When enclosed, 22 million pounds of roof panels cover the field.

27 of 30

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.