csmonitor.com - The Christian Science Monitor Online
 

States balk at higher-ed mandate

The House has cleared a bill that forces states to stabilize taxpayer funding for public colleges.

Page 1 of 2

This feature requires a newer version of Macromedia Flash Player and javascript-enabled browser.

Get Flash Player

Reporter Stacy Teicher Khadaroo discusses a bill before Congress that would require states to maintain higher-education spending.

Efforts to make higher education more affordable are on the threshold of becoming law. The House and Senate have both passed versions of a bill that would increase federal grants for students and crack down on problems in the college loan industry.

But there's a sticking point: The House insists that states maintain consistent funding for public colleges and universities. Governors and state legislators have cried foul, saying the feds don't have the right to dictate such matters.

With an economic downturn threatening state budgets – and concern that higher education is out of reach for a growing number of students – the controversy puts a spotlight on the relationship between state funding and public-college affordability.

"When state budgets are very tight, higher education is usually not funded [as well] because the perspective of a state policymaker is, 'Well, they can raise tuition and find the funds from their students,' " says Ross Hodel, codirector of the Center for the Study of Education Policy at Illinois State University. "The burden for student aid in the '90s and early 2000s clearly shifted from the taxpayer to the tuition-payer, and that's a trend that possibly the 'maintenance of effort' will help address."

The House "maintenance of effort" provision would withhold some federal money if a state failed to provide at least as much as its average spending for higher education over the past five years (not counting expenditures for capital projects and research and development).

"If the federal government is putting money in at the top, states shouldn't be able to take money out at the bottom," says Rachel Racusen, spokeswoman for the House Education and Labor Committee.

But opposition is "visceral" among state executives, says Ray Scheppach, executive director of the National Governors Association (NGA) in Washington. "This is 100 percent state money ... and it's inappropriate for the federal government to set any particular requirement on that money. States are sovereign."

Governors share federal lawmakers' concerns about high tuition, he says, and many are bringing together university leaders, boards of regents, and the private sector to find solutions.

Page 1 | 2 | Next Page

Related Stories
Get Monitor stories by e-mail:
(Your e-mail address will be protected by csmonitor.com's tough privacy policy.)
Photos of the Day
The best photos from May 13, 2008.

CAMPAIGN '08 Patchwork Nation
The American voter beyond red and blue

BOOKS When innocence and guilt intertwine
Past and present overlap in Louise Erdrich's lyrical new novel.

Daily podcast

Monitor Reports

Pat Murphy hosts today's podcast with Monitor reporters from around the world.


Today

Pat Murphy

Today's podcast features a report on Burmese cyclone survivors, Iranian influence in Iraq, President Bush's trip to Israel and a new law affecting taco trucks in Los Angeles.






Today's print issue
Today's Issue of The Christian Science Monitor