csmonitor.com - The Christian Science Monitor Online
 
What Punishment? Federal Judge Marcia Cook presided over the terror-conspiracy trial of Jose Padilla (c.) and Adham Hassoun (r.). Now she's overseeing their sentencing hearing.
What Punishment? Federal Judge Marcia Cook presided over the terror-conspiracy trial of Jose Padilla (c.) and Adham Hassoun (r.). Now she's overseeing their sentencing hearing.
Shirley Henderson/AP/FILE

Life in prison for Padilla?

In sentencing, the judge must find that the convicted Al Qaeda recruit aimed to influence a government. But his trial has scant record of motive.

Page 1 of 3

This feature requires a newer version of Macromedia Flash Player and javascript-enabled browser.

Get Flash Player

Reporter Warren Richey discusses the US government's efforts to have convicted Al Qaeda recruit Jose Padilla sentenced to prison for the rest of his life.

The US government's efforts to sentence convicted Al Qaeda recruit Jose Padilla and two codefendants to life in prison may have hit a snag.

Under federal sentencing guidelines, the three men could receive much shorter prison terms – perhaps 10 years or less. But prosecutors are asking US District Judge Marcia Cooke to authorize a "terrorism enhancement" to their sentences.

If the judge agrees, Mr. Padilla, Adham Hassoun, and Kifah Jayyousi could spend the rest of their lives in solitary confinement in a maximum-security prison.

But first Judge Cooke must answer this question: Were the three men's crimes calculated to coerce or influence a government?

If the answer is yes, the terrorism enhancement could apply, under the sentencing guidelines. If the answer is no, or if the judge is unable to answer the question, the terrorism enhancement is off the table. Cooke's ruling on the issue could come as early as Tuesday as the Padilla sentencing hearing extends into its second week.

The government influence question is designed to act as a fire wall within the sentencing guidelines to separate ordinary criminal activity that does not warrant substantial extra punishment from terrorism crimes, which do. What makes the question potentially difficult for the judge to answer is that prosecutors fought successfully during the trial to exclude any discussion or consideration of the defendants' motives.

"What concerns me is we went to great pains to not have motive in the trial," Cooke said in a hearing last week. "Now I am asked to make a determination about motive when the jury was told that was an inappropriate area of inquiry."

The case is being closely watched in part because of the controversial circumstances of Padilla's detention in US custody. Padilla, an American citizen, was held without charge for 3-1/2 years after being designated an enemy combatant by President Bush. He was subject to harsh interrogation techniques designed to break him psychologically and force him to reveal anything he might know about Al Qaeda.

When legal challenges to Padilla's military detention began to turn against the Bush administration, Padilla was moved to the criminal justice system in Miami and placed on trial for allegedly volunteering as an Al Qaeda recruit.

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page

Related Stories
Get Monitor stories by e-mail:
(Your e-mail address will be protected by csmonitor.com's tough privacy policy.)

Photos Photos of the Day
The best photos from July 24, 2008.

ELECTION '08 Patchwork Nation
The American voter beyond red and blue

FISHERIES Empty Oceans Series
The sea is no longer so vast.


Daily podcast

Monitor Reports

Pat Murphy hosts today's podcast with Monitor reporters from around the world.


Today

Pat Murphy

In today's podcast, we're concentrating on the reasons for rising consumer utility bills. Pat Murphy has a conversation with Monitor reporter Ron Scherer.




Today's print issue
Today's Issue of The Christian Science Monitor