Bush's lame-duck advantage

Liberated from electoral pressures, the White House is sticking to its guns.

As his term winds down in disarray, President Bush enjoys what could be called the lame-duck advantage: He doesn't have to worry about losing at the polls.

He has devoted little attention after the Virginia Tech massacre to issues such as campus safety and gun control, except to reiterate support for gun ownership. He has left it to the Democrats to take on the gun problems that usually divide Congress. Senate majority leader Harry Reid says, "I hope there's not a rush to do anything. We need to take a deep breath."

Earlier in his administration, Mr. Bush might have by now accepted the resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, a liability for the administration. But these days, Bush is playing the "loyalty card" all the way.

After Mr. Gonzales's disastrous appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, Bush said he has more confidence than ever in his beleaguered attorney general.

For Democrats, the most ticklish situation has become the $124 billion emergency spending bill for Iraq and Afghanistan. With growing sentiment for ending military involvement, the Democrats are looking for some compromise with the White House: a timetable, benchmarks; the latest being advisory opinion.

The White House, less concerned about losing votes in the next election, is sticking to its guns (almost literally). The legislation passed by Congress this week – with its Iraq withdrawal schedule – is certain to be met with a presidential veto.

And, since he is less concerned about voters, Mr. Bush apparently feels he can afford a veto, which is not likely to be overridden anyway.

Anyone who thinks that Iraq and Virginia Tech will bring great upsets in America's government is likely to be disappointed.

Liberated from electoral pressures, other presidents might use the opportunity to take action on reforms that really matter to them. In George Bush's case, being a lame duck president allows him to let others take action – or none at all.

Daniel Schorr is a senior news analyst at National Public Radio.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK