Europe's rising unease over 'terror war'

Charges in Italy against suspected CIA agents highlight growing dissent on America's antiterror tactics.

By Robert Marquand | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

from the February 21, 2007 edition

Page 1 of 2

PARIS - An Italian judge who ordered 25 CIA operatives to stand trial June 8 – as well as the large public protest in Vicenza, Italy, last week over the expansion of a US military base – adds momentum and edge to a widening division between the US and Europe over tactics in the international "war on terror" – even if a recent upstart attitude in Europe is not expected to be a relations-wrecker with Washington.

The 25 alleged CIA agents and a US Air Force officer, along with Italy's head of intelligence, Nicolo Pollari, were indicted Feb. 16 for snatching Muslim cleric Osama Nasr off the streets of Milan in 2003 and taking him to Germany and then Egypt, where Mr. Nasr claims he was tortured. If the trial proceeds, it would be the first trial of Americans in an "extraordinary renditions" case – even if the Americans refuse to appear. Under Italian law, suspects can be tried in absentia.

In a similar case, a Munich prosecutor called two weeks ago for the extradition of 13 suspected CIA operatives, alleging the kidnapping and torture of a German resident of Lebanese descent.

In part, experts say, legal and vocal frustration in Europe over US policies have been sparked both by the length and ambiguity of the terror war, as well as the possible scale of the renditions-flights program of kidnapped suspects. An EU report issued last week in Brussels that condemns covert activity suggests "at least" 1,245 such flights in EU states occurred since 2001. It also suggests complicity between individual states and the US.

"Nobody objected to these cases at the beginning, when there were just a few of them, reported on occasionally, which was a morally ambiguous situation," says Michael Clarke at the Center for Defense Studies, King's College in London. "But in the recent atmosphere in Europe, in which the war on terror is seen as a misstep, there are starker divides between the American definition of an international war, and the European view, which is of a criminal justice issue with international ramifications."

New criticism of 'war on terror'

That atmosphere in an open-ended terror war has prompted a closer look in Europe at the mechanics of cooperation with US intelligence agencies, opening the door to embarrassing questions into past behavior by EU states, including what might be called the "outsourcing of torture."

The EU report, for example, points to a legal opinion in Britain by a former adviser to the foreign ministry, Michael Wood, arguing that use of information extracted by torture does not violate UN torture conventions so long as a state does not "directly participate" in that torture.

Even so, some experts on justice and terror point out that the 77-page EU report contains more outrage than the kind of facts that could prompt serious investigations by EU states.

Few of the experts or diplomats summoned before an EU committee bothered to appear. Moreover, much of the tracking of CIA flights took place by private groups, and hobbyists known as plane spotters; such tracking has proven useful in producing journalistic reports, and putting pressure on governments, but is not considered reliable enough for formal evidence.

Page 1 | 2 | Next Page