Iraqi vote points to Islamist path
Early returns reveal that Shiites and Sunnis opted for religious parties.
Stretching newfound democratic muscle upon their first chance to elect a full-term government, Iraqis overwhelmingly threw their support behind religious parties defined along sectarian lines and ethnicity.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
A bloc of Shiite religious parties close to Iran has, according to results released Tuesday, attracted the largest percentage of voters.
Here in the capital, a national barometer because it is the most diverse of Iraq's 18 provinces, the United Iraq Alliance - religious Shiites who dominated the interim government formed in May - won about 58 percent of the vote.
A Sunni Islamist alliance comprised of politicians who have defended the insurgency campaign against US troops came in next, with close to 19 percent.
Trailing in third is Iyad Allawi, a secular Shiite who was favored by the US and Iraqi moderates hoping to rise above the country's rising sectarianism. Mr. Allawi, billed as a man who could unite parties and crack down on terrorism, received less than 14 percent of the vote.
Results are still preliminary and a final count may not be announced until January. But what clearly emerges is the tendency of millions of Iraqis to turn to religious and sectarian leaders to represent their interests in the post-Saddam political arena.
With more than three-quarters of the country giving a vote of confidence to Islamist parties, last Thursday's vote raises the prospect of Iraq being more overtly religious than ever before.
The ideological orientation of the two leading vote-getters means Washington may have to work with a government of leaders who have resented the US presence here and demanded some kind of timetable for a troop withdrawal.
Clouding the election process are more than 1,000 complaints of irregularities, 20 of them considered serious enough to be deemed "red-card" violations. "The results won't be announced until those red complaints are resolved," said US Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad.
Several Iraqi observers say they were deeply concerned over whether voters will see the results as legitimate, and raised the possibility of increased strife if claims of vote-rigging and the use of force at the polls are not answered.
Both Allawi and the Sunni alliance have made charges of voter fraud, and suggested that the Iraqi election commission was stacked with Shiite sympathizers.
"What will happen if even five of these red complaints don't get resolved?" asks Ismail Zayer, the editor of the Sabah el-Jadida (New Morning) newspaper. "We will have a national crisis on our hands because I don't think the Sunni coalition will accept that," he adds. "I think a lot of the moderates were putting their hopes in Allawi because he was the one who was going to be able to bridge the gap as a secular person who didn't want to focus on sectarian interests."
Since its creation as a nation-state by British and other power brokers in the post-World War I Middle East, Iraq has been tenuously held together by emphasizing national identity over religious and sectarian ties. Sunni Arabs, however, were entrusted with the country's leadership. And although Saddam Hussein's Baath Party was set up to be a supposedly secular nationalist party with roots in socialism, the former dictator increasingly relied on Sunni tribal ties to maintain his power base.