Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search



Advertisements
About these ads


Corporations pitch in to pay for cleanups

But hundreds of other hazardous waste sites receive little attention because of funding shortfalls.



  • Print
  • E-mail newsletters
  • RSS

By Mark ClaytonStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / October 20, 2005

When General Electric agreed earlier this month to clean up toxic PCBs it dumped into the Hudson River over decades, federal officials hailed it as a victory for the environment - and for the Superfund, the federal system created to mop up such infamous toxic waste sites as Love Canal.

Superfund sites like the GE-Hudson River are part of an apparent trend in which more polluters are stepping forward to pay for such cleanups, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports.

Yet numerous "orphan" hazardous waste sites remain - those with no "responsible party," such as General Electric, able or willing to pay for cleanups.

In just the past four years, there has been a 185 percent jump in special accounts established for specific site cleanups - and $2.8 billion in private-party financial commitments to do the job, the 2004 Superfund annual report issued last month reveals.

Superfund has been slow to clean up these sites due to chronic funding shortfalls. Money has dried up because Congress has refused to continue taxing polluting industries, defined as taxing the production of chemical pollutants found in waste sites.

It may cost more than $500 million to clean the Hudson River Superfund site. Dredging the river is scheduled to begin in 2007. In other examples, the Atlantic Richfield Company and NorthWestern Corporation agreed in August to clean the Milltown Reservoir Superfund site in Montana in a $100 million settlement, the Department of Justice and the EPA announced.

Earlier, DuPont completed cleanup of Necco Park in Niagara Falls, N.Y. in 2002 under EPA oversight, and in June the corporation agreed to reimburse the EPA $2.7 million for past costs.

Hundreds of the approximately 1,600 Superfund sites on the National Priorities List of toxic waste cleanup sites fall into the orphan-site category, according to environmental critics.

The pace of cleaning up orphan sites over the past four years has slowed dramatically. At the same time, the annual number of Superfund sites designated as cleaned up has also dropped by about half in that period.

With this slowing, some question whether a weakened Superfund will be able do its job adequately in the aftermath of hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

The EPA lists 54 Superfund sites in Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama. But even though emergency funding from Congress will clean up many immediate messes, the number of orphan Gulf Coast Superfund sites will soon mushroom, waste watchdogs say.

"We know there are cleanup sites at dozens of gas stations, dry cleaners, and pesticide plants - discoveries that are going to be made a year or two from now, well after FEMA leaves," says Lois Gibbs, executive director of the Center for Health, Environment and Justice in Falls Church, Va.

Polluters have an incentive to strike deals with the federal government since without steady funding, the EPA is in a weak position to bargain on cleanups and must often accept polluter's terms or face years in court it cannot afford, critics say.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail newsletters
  • RSS

Photos of the day

02.09.10 »