Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

Why socially responsible funds are behind this month

IF I'm investing in good companies, why is my social portfolio lagging the market?



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions

July 11, 2005

Ethical investors usually do about as well as traditional investors, research shows. But that's not the case this year. The Domini Social 400, the best-known index of socially responsible firms, has fallen about 2 percent, much more than the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, which is virtually even for the year. There's a reason, says Eric Packer, Boston-based investment adviser with Progressive Asset Management, the socially responsible division of Financial West Group. Here are excerpts of his comments:

Q: Why was June a down month?

Mr. Packer: We're looking at some really major problems in the economy. We're looking at the shock of oil prices. We're looking at consumers who've been concerned about a lot of the prices for their food, their energy. And also there's a little bit of concern about not knowing where interest rates are going.

Q: Why is the Domini 400 down for 2005 while the S&P 500 is at break-even?

EP: One of the problems is that the energy area is underrepresented in the Domini. And it's also not in tobacco. There was a recent change in the [federal government's] tobacco litigation, where it was originally [asking] $130 billion. It looks like they may be settling for $14 billion. So it's been a very good last few months for tobacco.

Q: Is the lag temporary?

EP: If you take a look at the longer-term performance of the Domini, a three-year and a five-year period, you're looking at pretty much parity. In fact, there are certain periods of time where the Domini has slightly outperformed the S&P 500. We believe if you have that long-term perspective ... we feel they're going to have further parity.

Q: Why are some ethical mutual funds moving into areas they previously shunned?

EP: That's a fairly new phenomenon. Historically in social funds, you had something called avoidance. There were problematic areas - it could be energy, it could be defense contractors, it could be consumer products. But what we're finding now is that there are certain areas, particularly energy, where some social fund [managers] feel they can use a best-of-class approach.

Q: Best of class? Who wouldn't want that?

EP: It's somewhat gray. Here's a way you can include a problematic area in your portfolio but feel you're investing in a best-of-class company [that's not in a great industry but at least operates more responsibly than its competitors].

Q: We also are seeing new niche funds.

EP: Sometimes, we'll have clients who say 'I want to really feel the companies I'm investing in are making a difference. Avoidance isn't enough. I want my companies to be more proactive.' One fund particularly that we think is exciting is New Alternatives.

Q: What do they invest in?

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions