Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

At vortex of violence - Fallujah

Killings Wednesday of contractors in the Sunni Triangle underscore the area's culture of revenge.

By Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / April 2, 2004


The simple question on everyone's lips is "why?" - why do Fallujah and its environs remain the most dangerous place for US forces in Iraq?

Skip to next paragraph

As with everything in Iraq these days, the answer depends on whom you ask. US Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt said the bloodshed in Fallujah was a symptom of a town "that just doesn't get it," and of a people determined to turn back the clock.

"This was a city that profited immeasurably ... under the former regime. They have a view that somehow the harder they fight, the better chance they have of achieving some sort of restorationist movement," General Kimmitt said Wednesday. Thursday, US administrator Paul Bremer promised Wednesday's killings in Fallujah "will not go unpunished."

But to Iraqi experts on the deeply clannish tribal networks of much of the Sunni Triangle, the horrifying killings and mutilation of four US security contractors Wednesday were more about a people obsessed with personal honor and revenge than evidence of nostalgia for Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

To them, the scenes were simply the extensionof a cultural clash that began soon after the US Army's 82nd Airborne Division took control of the area last spring.

"You can never forget that in this area retaliation is almost the fundamental element of the tribal system, its focal point,'' says Sadoun al-Dulame, a Baghdad-based political scientist who grew up in the area as a member of the Dulame tribe, one of its largest. "This is a revenge culture where insults to people's honor will always be repaid with violence."

The 82nd Airborne is handing control of the area to the Marines, and coalition officials say the transitional period may have led to the fillip in violence, with insurgents testing new troops' resolve. In addition to the four contractors, five US troops were killed by a bomb on the same day. March has been the second-deadliest month for US troops in postwar Iraq, and officials are bracing for more, ahead of the anticipated June 30 handover of Iraqi sovereignty.

Mr. Bremer vowed Thursday that the Fallujah attacks will not "derail the march towards stability and democracy."

A solution to the trouble in Fallujah lies in what form that democracy will take. If the transition plan for Iraq being crafted by the US, the UN, and Iraqi partners convinces Sunni towns like Fallujah that their interests will be protected in a new Iraq, likely to be dominated by the Shiite majority, they will eventually lay down their weapons, even if it means giving up age-old Sunni control of Iraq.

But crafting the plan and getting buy-in from deeply suspicious citizens in towns like Fallujah will take time, with most analysts saying the most optimistic timeframe is about a year.

Fallujah is far from the only place where tribal traditions are strong, or where support for Mr. Hussein's regime ran deep. In Sunni Triangle towns like Ramadi, Bayji, and Tikrit, Hussein's hometown, many of the same variables are at play. But none of these towns have the local support or savagery of attacks seen in Fallujah.

Amatzia Baram, an Iraq expert at the US Institute for Peace in Washington, points to a challenging confluence of factors in Fallujah. Like a number of towns in the Sunni Triangle, Fallujah has a large number of residents from Saddam Hussein's Albu Nasser tribe, and a high percentage of people who served in his armed forces and intelligence forces. But what makes Fallujah different, Dr. Baram says, may be Sunni Islam.

The town is deeply Islamic, and strongly influenced by the Salafy traditions of neighboring Jordan, Syria, and Saudi Arabia, a factor he attributes to its position on the Euphrates, which flows from Syria and has provided an umbilical cord to the Moslem world since the Islamic conquest.