- Why a Saudi blogger faces a possible death sentence for three tweets
- America's big wealth gap: Is it good, bad, or irrelevant?
- Xi Jinping, future Chinese president, faces test on first White House visit (+video)
- Iran accuses Israel of setting up attacks on its own diplomats
- Valentine's Day: cost of romance rising for flower delivery, 4 other things
- No budget? No problem! The strange politics behind a budgetless America.
Among Iran's hard-liners, little respect for reform-minded
Conservatives, expected to reclaim control of parliament after elections Friday, wield the greatest power in Iran.
In the black-and-white world of Iran's hard-liners, the word "compromise" is not part of the lexicon. The term "enemy" dominates instead, and applies as often to profligate fellow Iranians as to purported American spies.
Mohamad Hussein Azemi, a diehard revolutionary and a city clerk from western Iran, knows how to deal with enemies.
"I want to put a strong fist in the mouths of those who talk rubbish," Mr. Azemi declares. "They are not our brothers. Those who drink alcohol and use drugs - do you think they are human beings?
"I hope they recognize their sins and recommit to the revolution," Azemi says, scoffing at the privileged, often secular lives of Iranians who inhabit a different world and despise clerical rule. "They have the power to choose the right path."
Even among hard-line Iranians at a recent celebration or at Friday prayers, there are shades of gray. Some advocate violence against the "enemy within"; others say rhetorical persuasion is enough. If conservatives reclaim control of parliament after Friday's elections, as expected, new political divisions are likely to emerge between conservative factions. The tough faction will cling to hard-line views, while moderates have signaled intent to address some issues of the popular reform agenda - a recipe for future rightwing clashes.
But bedrock hard-line beliefs - devotion to God and to Islam, and vows to follow Iran's supreme leader to the "last drop of blood" - drive the true believers and wield most power in modern Iran.
The chasm between these parallel worlds could not be greater, or potentially more explosive. For while such believers say their prayers and wish to secure a place in heaven with martyrdom, their counterparts - fed up with years of social restrictions and lack of freedom - flout all rules in protest, with hip-hugging clothes, lipstick, and the deepest disdain.
Both sides in this social and political tug-of-war are convinced they speak for the majority, but hardly recognize or respect how the other half lives.
"They are not reformists - they are all pagans," says Yaghoub Ramazani, a Revolutionary Guard and veteran of the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s, whose brother died a "martyr" on the battlefield - a fate he says is the "ultimate death in this world," and a price he wishes he could have paid.
"They make no difference to us at all, and their numbers are not as high as you think," says Mr. Ramazani, charging that "immoral" acts of some Iranians "put national security at risk."
"It is our duty to convince [irreverent Iranians] to do good things," says Ramazani, who declined to give his rank or current job. "Maybe we are sad about what they do in their hearts, and tell them - and if they still don't listen, we have to hit them with the impact of a hammer.
"Our law specifies, according to Islam, what to do with them," the strong-featured officer says. "It may be fines, it may be prison, it may be lashings."
A group of like-minded people gather around to listen before prayer time, and began chanting their support in unison. Another man said this was a common view in this strata of Iranian society.
"[Ramazani] reflected the true words in our hearts," said Safar Esfandyareh, a carpenter. "When we have such people in our country, we do not fear the US, the West, or even the reformists."
But violence is not accepted by all who believe in the pillars of sacrifice, martyrdom - and anti-US fervor - that have defined the revolution for 25 years. Reformers could not have made their demands for social change and freedom, and the scale of their majority in this society, any clearer, after giving pro-reform leaders three landslide election victories since 1997.
Page: 1 | 2 



