Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

'Got him.'

For Bush, a coup; for Americans, a mix of joy, relief, and wait-and-see.



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions

By Linda Feldmann, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / December 15, 2003

WASHINGTON

The dramatic capture of Saddam Hussein grabbed America's attention Sunday morning - sending a wave of elation through the White House, forcing the Democratic presidential candidates to pivot quickly on a central campaign theme, and giving the American people a moment's pause from their Sunday morning rituals.

At 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the mood was one of joyous relief at a long-hoped-for moment of catharsis. Amid all the criticism of the Iraq occupation, here was some indisputable good news that could bear directly on the US ability to turn over control of Iraq to the Iraqis.

Politics did not rest, as one by one, the Democratic candidates churned out statements congratulating American forces for the skilled capture, and then attempting to shift the focus to the longer-term challenges ahead.

Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman (D), whose candidacy has struggled, sharply went after Democratic front-runner Howard Dean on NBC's "Meet the Press." When asked whether Hussein's capture was bad for Dean, Senator Lieberman responded, "It should be. If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power, not in prison, and the world would be a much more dangerous place."

The news makes Monday's long-planned foreign-policy speeches by Dr. Dean and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) of New York all the more important. For Dean, it is a signal moment to flesh out policies in a realm where critics call him weak. Though his opposition to the war gave early animus to his campaign, Democratic observers, including supporters, agree that the time has come for him to elaborate on the range of foreign-policy matters.

The coincidence of Senator Clinton's speech - from a central Democratic leader who long figured in speculation about possible presidential ambitions - is likely to highlight different strains of thought within the party about Iraq and foreign policy. Clinton has represented a more hawkish point of view on Iraq than has Dean.

Around the country, Americans were delighted that a tyrant who'd tortured so many could be brought to justice. Independent pollster John Zogby predicts President Bush will get a bump in polls, but the spike will drift back down.

"As things settle to reality, those sort-of leaning Democrats, sort-of liberals, who jump over to the other side when there's something like this, always seem to come back," says Mr. Zogby. "This won't change anything even in the medium haul, let alone the long haul."

For most people, judging by street interviews in Chicago; Sumter, S.C.; and Raleigh, N.C.; the news Sunday morning commanded attention - but didn't seem to sway previously held views on the Iraq war.

"I woke up and thought I was dreaming," said Mary Featherston, a retired Ameritech worker in Chicago, on her way to mass amid the fresh snowfall. "I turned on Channel 5. I was like, 'Is this for real?' " Asked how she felt, she teared up: "I'm glad. I just hope this means no more of our guys are going to get killed over there." [Editor's note: The original version misspelled Mary Featherston's name.]

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions