Recalling Gore v. Bush

Postponing any election three weeks before it's to be held takes pluck, especially in California, the most populous state, whose politics echo far beyond the Sierras.

Yet three plucky judges on the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals did just that on Monday - even with the possible perverse effect of delaying California's recall election until March.

But despite adding to the recall election's circus-like atmosphere, the judges did a service by citing the Supreme Court's decision in the Florida ballot recount that gave the White House to George Bush. Now the nation's highest court may be asked to clarify its groundbreaking reasoning in that 2000 decision.

The Supreme Court, citing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, found that Florida could not provide "equal protection" in a recount with so many different standards for judging hanging chads and other irregularities in a punch-card ballot system.

The Ninth Circuit's judges took that reasoning a step further, perhaps too far. They said California erred in letting six of its counties use punch cards for this election, claiming the error rate could be higher than with newer voting systems the state has been phasing in. (Note: Their judgment came before any errors had been made, in contrast to the Florida case.)

The question for the Supreme Court is this: How perfect should voting be, given that some voters will always make mistakes and no election system is perfect? The courts must define a reasonable standard in voting - otherwise every aggrieved group will claim that even the smallest risk of someone not voting correctly is an excuse to upend an election.

The burden to make voting easy and accurate falls on local election officials, but both the 2000 decision and now this one have opened up an endless quest for balloting perfection: one that can be too easily manipulated by either side before or after an election.

Defining an acceptable error rate in voting won't be easy, and given the perception of a politicized judiciary, the task won't be an easy one for the Supreme Court.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK