Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

Iraqi attacks on US: isolated acts?

US forces in Fallujah were ambushed Tuesday in the deadliest of a series of assaults this week.



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions

By Ilene R. Prusher, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / May 29, 2003

FALLUJAH, IRAQ

At the intersection here where two American soldiers were attacked and killed Tuesday, a crowd of about 40 Iraqis spoke with a unanimous voice: This would not be the last deadly assault on the US military in Iraq.

"We are going to do something much bigger than that," warns Abdul Settar Hamid al-Fellahi, a driver in a long white robe. "Like what the Palestinians do to Israel, that's what we will do to the Americans."

The violence in Fallujah - which also injured nine US soldiers and damaged a helicopter - was only the latest in a series of assaults on US soldiers in Iraq this past week. US officials in Baghdad hope the attacks represent localized threats to coalition troops occupying Iraq. But military analysts say there is a danger that the incidents can't be dismissed as random, vigilante violence.

"If there are one-off attacks, they can get over it. But if this is the beginning of a series of attacks, then the coalition has a problem on its hands, and the only solution to this is to put a large numbers of troops on the ground," says Charles Heyman, the editor of Jane's World Armies in London, England.

According to Mr. Heyman, the number of US troops in Baghdad - about 20,000 plus a few hundred British troops - is far too few for a city of its size. "If you're going to dominate a city in times of insecurity, you need to have large numbers of troops." Outside the capital, he says, US and United Kingdom forces are even more thinly spread. "The US doesn't have enough infantry and the UK doesn't have enough either to control a country the size of Iraq."

On Sunday in Baqubah, 45 miles northeast of Baghdad, a woman approaching US soldiers carrying two hand grenades was shot and killed. On Monday, a US Army supply convoy was attacked in Hadithah, 120 miles northwest of Baghdad, killing one soldier.

Later that day in western Baghdad, one US soldier was killed and three were injured when their Humvee ran over a land mine "in an apparent hostile act," according to a statement from the US Central Command. Hundreds of US soldiers passed through western Baghdad Wednesday in response.

In this spate of attacks, Fallujah - a city west of Baghdad where Saddam Hussein's Baath Party remains famously popular - is a likely focal point. "Fallujah is considered by many to be a read-out of the Baath Party," says a spokesman for ORHA, the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance.

But Mr. Fellahi insists this is not just about Fallujah. "This is not just one message. All of these are messages aimed at making the Americans leave our country," he says.

President Bush declared the end of major combat operations at the start of May. Now US forces here are primarily engaged in a campaign to win the peace - a feat that may prove far more difficult than winning the war.

US image here is particularly vulnerable, in part because of growing public disenchantment with the pace of forming an interim civilian administration that would take charge under the aegis of coalition forces. The Bush administration has decided to delay the creation of an interim authority until, as some US officials here describe it, they can find an appropriate balance of people who will be representative of all Iraqis and can manage the postwar transition.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions