Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search



Advertisements
About these ads


Team works

The stereotype of a lone artist struggling in a garret is being replaced by a team ethos. Call it 'do it ourselves' art.



  • Print
  • E-mail newsletters
  • RSS

By Carol StricklandSpecial to The Christian Science Monitor / January 17, 2003

NEW YORK

"Art," the avant-garde composer John Cage believed, "is not self-expression but self-alteration." The ascendancy of this approach to creating art, which values transformation over personal vision, might explain an incremental shift in the art world.

As more artists work collaboratively or in art collectives, the stereotype of the lone artist in a garret is fading. In place of the romantic ideal of the figure sweating in front of an easel is a growing teamwork ethos, particularly among young artists. As a result of a greater focus on the process than the product, "do-it-ourselves" now seems more hip than do-it-yourself.

"It's less 'me, me, me,' " says James Yood, who teaches art theory at Northwestern University in Chicago, "and more, 'Let's see what we can do together.' "

At the 2002 Biennial at the Whitney Museum of American Art, a survey of art from the last two years, the number of pieces by artist collectives was striking.

Experts and artists agree that there are benefits to collaboration, including the sheer scale of the products that can be attempted and an interplay of ideas that can lead to greater creativity. But there still needs to be an artistic vision - otherwise the group approach can lead to diluted, uninspired work - not to mention creating the potential for artistic temperaments to clash. The difference is that the vision is no longer intertwined with one individual's personality.

Lawrence Rinder, the Whitney exhibition's curator, says of this team mentality, "There's definitely something in the air, particularly with the younger generation." Edward Kerns, an art professor at Lafayette College in Easton, Pa., agrees that "it's a generational thing. Students who grow up with networking systems are used to working together."

Who is that masked artist?

For the Guerrilla Girls, an art collective founded in 1985, it's about solidarity. "Frida Kahlo," a founding member (who uses the name of the deceased artist to preserve anonymity), says, "People want to create community."

In addition to not using their real names, the Guerrilla Girls wear masks when they appear in public to keep the focus on issues, not personalities. The self-styled "conscience of the art world," they pursue an overtly political goal: to expose sexist and racist discrimination.

Working on ensemble projects such as posters, billboards, and books has advantages, according to the founders. "It's better not to be a lone, angry person making art in a studio," Ms. Kahlo says. "You have a built-in editor. Your own delusion of the importance of your ideas is tempered by another's view. And you can get more envelopes addressed with help than alone."

"Basically, it's just so much fun," adds cofounder "Kathe Kollwitz."

Artworks with plural authorship fall into several categories: (1) projects of great complexity, such as public art, (2) performance art, requiring audience participation, (3) communal projects and workshops, and (4) true collectives, in which individual identities are submerged in the group ethos.

Collaboration can be purely practical. Sculptor Wopo Holup, commissioned to produce a huge stone bas-relief along the walls of New York's Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, says her project is "so big and complex, I could never do it by myself. It would take 300 Egyptians 30 years to carve the panels."

A cast of thousands

The epitome of public art - requiring a cast of thousands - is the work of Christo and Jeanne-Claude, known for vast projects, such as surrounding 11 islands in Biscayne Bay with floating pink fabric (1980-83). They also hired 2,200 workers to set up 3,100 umbrellas in Japan and California (1984-91).

Their projects can take decades from conception to realization. The process of working with the public, as well as with engineers and administrators, is essential to how the art's identity is shaped.

"Participation is key," Jeanne-Claude says. "The final form comes from inspiration and interaction with the site."

Their works, such as "The Gates," proposed for New York's Central Park, arouse public debate.

"Thousands try to stop us. Thousands try to help us," Christo says.

In the process, a public dialogue about art ensues before a project exists. When the work is installed and the public interacts with it, "in those 14 days," Jeanne-Claude says, "everybody owns the work."

With performance art, public involvement is a must.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail newsletters
  • RSS

Photos of the day

02.09.10 »