Return of college peaceniks
Students join antiwar protests, but many are skeptical their action will alter US policy on Iraq.
(Page 2 of 2)
He and others are skeptical of this administration and worry that Iraq could be just the first target of Mr. Bush's new strike-first doctrine. He also has little faith in the America's commitment to nurturing stable governments after the fighting stops. "The US just has such a short attention span," he says, citing its meager nation-building in Afghanistan.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
This hardy skepticism of government is actually a subtle but significant difference between today's students and those in the early days of the Vietnam era, observers say. In the early 1960s, the US government had a strong history of recent success in World War II and the cold war, "So, it took a long time for students to think it was OK to oppose American foreign policy," says Professor Isserman, who teaches history at Hamilton College in Clinton, N.Y. But these days, students are quick to voice skepticism, partly because "Vietnam and Watergate have created a healthy distrust of authority."
Many students will likely be at big antiwar rallies planned for Oct. 26 in Washington, D.C. and San Francisco. Many already joined the so-called "Not in Our Name" protests that took place this weekend in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.
But there's another key difference between the two generations and it shows in Mr. Myers's attitude about the rallies. He says war with Iraq is probably "inevitable" and that no amount of marching or chanting or drum-beating will likely change that.
Indeed, in this era of low voter turnout and the Supreme Court arbitrating the 2000 election, there's less '60s-style, make-love-not-war idealism, observers say. Many students "feel a great deal of alienation from the political process," says Jeffrey Murer, a political scientist at Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania. The marginalization of such protests as the Million Mom March for gun control only furthers this cynicism, he says.
But just like their Vietnam-era counterparts, today's students are talking about the draft. One Harvard junior, who asked to remain anonymous, has already discussed it with his mom, who's a medical doctor. "If there's a draft, she's going to cut off my pinkie toe so I won't be eligible," he says resolutely. And he's not alone. A poll by Luntz Research found that 37 percent of college students would try to evade a draft and another 19 percent would serve only if they were stationed inside the US.
Yet not everyone is opposed to military action in Iraq, preemptive or otherwise. "I would send in Delta Force snipers to get Saddam," says Ryan Nelson, a burly junior at Harvard and ex-ROTC member. "You know one guy, one bullet, case closed."
Many students are more nuanced, evaluating issues beyond one ruler and one bullet. "I'm trying to figure out how we can stand responsibly as young people and use the power of our superpower in a good way," says Jonathan Colon, an art major at the University of Massachusetts at Boston. "I mean, the identity of America is at stake here."