Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Troubled schools seek old-fashioned hero

Philadelphia opts for a talented individual over private firm to improve schools

By Marjorie CoeymanStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / September 10, 2002


As the schools in her city opened last week, Philadelphia Daily News columnist Jill Porter issued a special invitation to Paul Vallas, the new head of Philadelphia schools, asking him to meet her at the Schuylkill River. "I wanted to see if he actually could walk on water," she wrote.

Skip to next paragraph

Ms. Porter may have been joking, but many Philadelphians are truly hoping for miracles from Mr. Vallas. He is being touted as the potential savior of the city's schools – schools which fairly recently were being described by the national press as so hopelessly substandard that only intervention from the private, for-profit world could turn them around.

But privatization – a solution much touted in the 1990s – now seems to be taking a back seat to the more traditional notion that one talented individual can pump new energy into a struggling school system. While some observers argue that this option has serious limitations, others see it as more promising than placing hope for reform in the hands of profit-oriented firms with no strong community ties.


Vallas's arrival on the scene represents an abrupt about-face from plans formulated just a few months ago to cast Edison Schools Inc. in that role.

The state, which took over the deeply troubled city school system last spring, was pushing a plan to give the for-profit school-management company control of the school system's central administration, in addition to hiring it to run 45 of the city's 264 schools. It was a radical idea, seen by some as an admission that the city simply could not run its own schools without outside help.

But the plan met with powerful public resistance. The state was forced to rethink its approach, ultimately removing Edison from any central-management role and assigning it only 20 city schools to run.

The management of another 25 schools has been divvied up between two other for-profit companies, two universities, and two community-development groups.

Despite the shift, the arrangement still leaves the city at the forefront of the nation's experiment with privatization of public schools, with nearly 30,000 students and almost 1 in 6 of its schools under outside management.

Vallas says the private companies will have their chance. But he announced almost as soon as he arrived in Philadelphia that he would be making the decisions. And he has made it clear he will remove the firms promptly if they don't perform.

Some insist that if anyone can work miracles in Philadelphia, it is Vallas.

He comes to the city after six years at the helm of the Chicago public schools. His track record there was mixed, but even his critics agree that he brought to the job considerable energy, enthusiasm, and the financial expertise of his previous work as city budget director. By the time he left, math and reading scores were up, 71 new schools had been built, and the school system's $3.5 billion budget was balanced.

Although some complained that early gains on test scores had reached a plateau by the end of Vallas's tenure, Chicago did see impressive increases in standardized test scores. When Vallas had arrived in Chicago, only 30 percent of students in Grades 3 to 8 were achieving the national average in math; 29 percent in reading. By the time he left, 43 percent surpassed the national average in math; 35 percent in reading.

Pointing to such achievements, many see Vallas as an ideal match for Philadelphia's heavily bureaucratic school system which, like Chicago's, is plagued with sagging test scores, crumbling infrastructure, and continual budget problems. If anything, the Philadelphia system with its 198,000 students is perhaps a bit less unwieldy than Chicago's 436,000-student system.

Build schools, target violence

Vallas has been quick to lay out his plans for the Philadelphia schools.

These include: spending $1 billion to $2.5 billion over five years to build nine new high schools and renovate many old school buildings; phasing out middle schools in favor of schools that run from kindergarten to eighth grade; creating more magnet schools; using schools as community centers, with more financial support from the city; asking Medicaid to better fund student-health services; and cracking down on school violence.