Black scholar renounces conservative 'crown'

It's a turnaround notable for its speed.

Just seven years ago, Glenn Loury won the American Book Award for a book that criticized the behavior of inner-city blacks and preached a gospel of self-reliance. "One By One From the Inside Out: Essays and Reviews on Race and Responsibility in America," also targeted affirmative action, claiming that the culture of dependency it spawned was detrimental to African-American advancement.

But broach those issues today with Professor Loury, a prominent academic long associated more with Ronald Reagan than with the black intellectual mainstream, and he'll offer a starkly different assessment.

In his latest book, released earlier this year, Loury no longer condemns affirmative action or beats the drum for self-improvement. Instead, "The Anatomy of Racial Inequality" stresses the subtle and pervasive stigmatism that blacks still face in America, a stigmatism for which, Loury argues, whites are largely to blame.

The mental journey is a dramatic one for a black academic, now an economics professor at Boston University. But one thing has remained consistent. At the end of the day, Loury is, and always has been, a "race man" – an intellectual preoccupied with matters of ethnicity and identity.

"Whatever else I say about race, I haven't forgotten that I'm black," Loury says. "That's a conditioned state of mind. It arises out of my particular instance, coming into the world the way I did, a world that was – quote – raced."

Born on the South Side of Chicago, a descendant of slaves, Loury was apolitical as a young man. But over time he came to question the civil rights establishment. That put him squarely at odds with many other African-Americans – but it also made him new friends. As an MIT-trained economist, author, and tenured professor at Harvard University during the 1980s, Loury was quickly adopted by conservatives, who helped propel his career.

But fairly quickly, he hit rough ground. "I thought I was pretty hot stuff," Loury admits. "But I was in a lot of trouble, and as events developed, I think that became clear." In 1987, Loury was arrested for possession of cocaine, to which he was addicted, and spent time in a halfway house.

The following year, he began to attend church, underwent baptism, and was born again. On the heels of this religious conversion came the realization that he needed to change his life and his politics.

"I had allowed myself to become, was rushing to become, this kind of finger-wagging critic of what we now call the underclass," he recalls.

In 1991, he left his post at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government for a higher-paying position at Boston University, where he began to lay the groundwork for who he is today. A tenured professor and director of the university's Institute on Race and Social Division, Loury now sees himself as a political progressive.

Not everyone, of course, is convinced that this new phase will last. Roy Innis, a conservative colleague and leader of the Congress on Racial Equality, questions the sincerity of Loury's "epiphany," as he calls it. "I'm usually very uneasy with these turnarounds. These 'finding the light on the way to Damascus,' St. Paul and the Bible kinds of things," he says.

But Charles Ogletree Jr., a professor at Harvard Law School, sees Loury's political makeover differently, sensing what he calls a "positive maturation" in Loury's views on race. "Time will tell where he takes these views, but I for one believe the change to be real and heartfelt," Professor Ogletree writes in an e-mail.

Heartfelt or not, Loury's evolution can be traced in his work. In "One by One From the Inside Out," Loury focuses on the need for African-Americans to help themselves, rather than remain victims of an unfair society. But in "The Anatomy of Racial Inequality," Loury focuses on the problematic behavior of white Americans, pointing out their flawed assumptions which, he argues, perpetuate and reinforce negative stereotypes of blacks.

"Then, I wanted mainly to say, what manner of people are we, or you, poor urban blacks, who behave in such a way," Loury says. "Now I want mainly to say, what manner of people are we, Americans, who countenance such an awful circumstance in our midst. That's a big difference in orientation."

Page: 1 | 2