Congress returns – to messy in-box

The 107th Congress returns Tuesday to the toughest issues of an already tumultuous legislative session – at a time when many are doubting that Capitol Hill counts.

The big jump in approval ratings that lawmakers picked up after 9/11 is gone. So, nearly, is the budget surplus that not long ago stood at an estimated $5.6 trillion for the next 10 years.

And on multiple fronts – from a possible war with Iraq to the shape of a new Department of Homeland Defense – the White House is claiming a mandate to act with little more than a congressional nod of approval.

"The president has decided that we are irrelevant," says one top Democratic Senate aide.

"Irrelevant" is surely an overstatement. But on several key measures, President Bush appears to hold the edge against a Democratic Senate. Other big bills will likely get tied up in election-year politicking. And lawmakers in both parties appear certain to end an era of fiscal discipline – by failing to extend provisions that tamed budget deficits in the 1990s.

Already, partisan bickering in recent months has created a staggering mass of unfinished business.

No appropriation bills have yet cleared the Congress. And the gap between Capitol Hill and the White House on how much to spend for those bills yawned into a chasm over the August recess.

The top priority when the Senate returns Tuesday will be homeland security, including a historic meeting of the Congress in New York Sept. 6 to honor that city's sacrifice on 9/11.

Some lawmakers had set Sept. 11 as a symbolic goal for completing work on a new Department of Homeland Security. The House approved a plan close to that proposed by the administration in July. But the Senate is objecting to the curbs on civil service protections and bargaining rights that Mr. Bush says are necessary if the new department is to be effective.

In the end, time is on the president's side, analysts say.

"No one wants to be accused of stopping something the president has declared essential to internal national security," says Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia.

A similar face-off is shaping up over the administration's Iraq policy. After White House lawyers advised that Bush need not consult with congressional leaders on a war with Iraq, members of both sides of the aisle, including senior Republicans, lined up to say that it would be wise if he did. These include House majority leader Dick Armey (R) of Texas and John Warner of Virginia, the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Until recently, the White House has been reluctant to have top administration officials testify before Congress on policy toward Iraq. Now, it appears likely that administration officials will testify before several panels.

Page: 1 | 2