Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


A rock star's new approach to world aid

This week, U2's Bono and Treasury Secretary O'Neill finish a 10-day African tour.

By Nicole ItanoSpecial to The Christian Science Monitor / May 30, 2002



JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA

As Irish rock star Bono and American Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill wind up their 10-day fact-finding tour of Africa this week, the U2 frontman is not yet sure if he's found what he was looking for: "big change" and an open US wallet for Africa.

Skip to next paragraph

Whether or not he convinces a skeptical Mr. O'Neill to increase US interest in Africa, Bono has created a new model for celebrity involvement in poverty relief. His approach may ultimately have a far more lasting effect on the developing world than the one-shot, disaster-driven fundraising efforts of the past.

This is not the first time a high-profile celebrity has taken a major international issue and turned it into a personal crusade. Diana, Princess of Wales, lobbied for an end to the use of land mines; Elizabeth Taylor took on AIDS in the 1980s; and Richard Gere, somewhat infamously, railed against Chinese control of Tibet at the 1993 Academy Awards.

But Bono's agenda – to persuade developed countries to give Africa more aid, sweeping debt relief, and better access to international markets – is broader and more complex than any previous pop-star campaign. He is attempting to address the root of Africa's ills rather than just the symptoms. Perhaps more important, the singer is using new tactics to get his message across, trading a mass-media awareness-raising campaign for quietly bending the ears of the rich and powerful.

"What makes Bono extremely interesting is that he's policy-focused," says Phil O'Keefe, a professor at England's University of Northumbria, who has written extensively about the politics of international aid. "He's made the shift that NGOs [nongovernmental organizations] like Oxfam and Save the Children have made, to say, 'Hey, we aren't going to be able to deal with this just by giving time and money. We've got to attack this as a political issue.' "

Live Aid – rocker Bob Geldof's mega-concerts to raise money for famine in Ethiopia, and still the most successful rock-star fundraising effort ever – created one model for celebrity involvement in social causes. Moved by horrific images of starving children in Ethiopia, Mr. Geldof put together a series of concerts in the mid-1980s, involving many of the biggest names in the pop-music world. The concerts raised $54 million for famine relief, and more important, aid workers say, awareness about the situation in Africa.

But after the spotlight left Ethiopia, many of the problems remained. "I don't think [Ethiopia] would have gotten the attention it did without Live Aid," says Joanna Macrae, coordinator of the Humanitarian Policy Group at the Overseas Development Institute in London. "But in a way the problem with Live Aid is a problem with all those quick, loud responses. They don't get to the root of the problems."

In the wake of the Ethiopian crisis, Dr. Macrae says the international aid community reevaluated the way it approached large-scale humanitarian crises. They realized that the typical response often failed to address the political, social, and economic causes of disaster, and that well-intentioned aid sometimes unintentionally exacerbated the situation. As a result, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, organizations began to focus more on the causes of poverty and disaster.

Permissions