Monitor Breakfast: Tom Ridge

Tom Ridge's life story reads like an advertisement for the American dream–at least until he landed his current job coordinating the work of 46 federal agencies involved in homeland security without having a Cabinet department to call his own.

If coordinating the federal effort were not enough, there are also the more-than 1,200 anti-terrorism bills states have drafted since Sept. 11.

Mr. Ridge grew up in public housing and won a scholarship to Harvard University.

After Harvard, he started law school and then was drafted into the Army where he won a bronze star for heroism. After his service in Vietnam, he finished law school and became an assistant district attorney. In 1982, he was elected to Congress, becoming the first Vietnam vet to serve there.

When President Bush named him homeland security director, Mr. Ridge was serving as governor of Pennsylvania, a post to which he had been twice elected.

I don't think random checks enhance security very much at airports. As part of an overall mix, it may not be a bad idea. But I think we have to bring the same kind of attention to people at our airports as we do to trying to identify weapons.

One of the suggestions we have–for want of a better word–is identifying no-risk or low-risk passengers. I have paid (when I was a frequent traveler) an annual fee to an airline to get access to coffee and a stale Danish as I waited for a connection. I think people would pay, share that information about themselves. You can double check it and you can make a rational, responsible assessment based on the likelihood of these people being terrorists. I think you have to combine not just looking for weapons and explosives. I think we ought to integrate that technology and direct technology toward people you think are high-risk or moderate-risk folks.

Same thing at the border. If you have companies that sign up for the customs/terrorism partnership, those trucks and those people will come through the fast lanes so your personnel and technology can be focused on the people and the cargo you don't know. The people who sign up on the border with fingerprint identification–Canada has checked them out, we have checked them out, they are citizens, they have been there for 15 or 20 years, they go back and forth every day, why shouldn't they go through so you can focus your people and your technology on the other side dealing with the vehicles and individuals and cargo you don't know."

"I don't believe we are where we want or need to be in just about any area of homeland security.

.... I mean the bottom line is that since 9-11 that this country has moved on parallel paths – not just the federal government but other levels of government and the private sector. I think you can point to just about every sector of the economy, every state, every community where they are thinking and acting differently and are better prepared to deal with potential attacks, certainly in a much better position having assessed the potential vulnerabilities.

We are across the board certainly better prepared but not by any means where we want or need to be a couple of years down the road. We cannot ever be 100 percent secure against 100 percent of the possibilities 100 percent of the time if we are to remain a free and open country. And obviously we are not gong to change that quality of America.

Page: 1 | 2