Engineers to the Rescue

It was immediately clear to robotics Prof. Robin Murphy that the rescue effort at ground zero could use some unconventional help. Within hours of the World Trade Center's collapse, she and her students were loading up a half-dozen prototype "rescue robots" from their lab at the University of South Florida in Tampa and heading to New York.

These squat, decidedly unglamorous forerunners of R2D2, with their headlights, infrared sensors, radio control units, and microprocessors sitting on bulldozer-style tracks, successfully pinch-hit for human rescuers - searching deep beneath the most hazardous rubble for survivors.

Although they didn't find any survivors, the robots located the remains of five people - and may have helped prevent more deaths. "We put one robot into a hole that they were going to put a man down," says Mark Micire, a USF graduate student. "They ended up losing the robot. But that $40,000 robot may have saved the life of a rescue person."

At many colleges, the response to terrorism has been a blend of emotion and intellectual debate. But at engineering schools, pragmatism has gone into overdrive. As they zero in on new technologies to thwart future attacks or help recover from them, engineering students and professors whose work once existed in the shadow of the ivory tower now find themselves in the spotlight.

Dr. Murphy, for one, understands why robots from academia haven't yet been widely used in rescue work.

"The fire-rescue community is technologically conservative," Murphy says. "You just can't have things fail in the field. If they have to stop to screw around with a robot or software that isn't working, well, that's costing lives. The technology hasn't been there until now."

Now that rescue robots have proved themselves outside the confines of the laboratory, Murphy predicts an influx of engineering-school programs to further improve the technology.

"Robots are certainly not replacing people in fire rescue," she says. "They've arrived as a tool - a very primitive tool. But in next three years, you'll see ... a new focus on it at universities. You'll see people, dogs, and robots working together at rescue sites."

Some will be very futuristic. At Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh, another set of robot-rescue pioneers are working on a "snake" robot that will slither into holes too small for today's robots, she says.

But robots are just one of many relevant technologies being developed. Anthony Atchley, a professor in the graduate acoustics program at Pennsylvania State at University Park, is creating advanced acoustic tools to search through rubble for survivors.

Still other projects fall within a category known as "protective technologies."

At the University of Oklahoma, for instance, Patrick McCann, a professor of electrical engineering, is working with several students to adapt sensitive medical laser technologies that will detect explosives and chemicals even if they are miles away.

And at Mississippi State University in Starkville, Christopher Eamon and his students are refining computer-simulation software that models the impact of different explosives on various types of blast-resistant walls in embassy buildings.

Technology to analyze the effect of blasts on buildings is not new, but so far, the software has been primitive and difficult to use. Improving it will allow for quicker, cheaper testing of hypothetical situations, Dr. Eamon says. Researchers could then develop walls and windows that minimize injuries to occupants if a bomb detonates outside.

Page: 1 | 2