Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


After court win, Boy Scouts face new fight

Gay-rights groups launch campaign to pull public funding and support from the group

By Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / September 13, 2000



One of the most quintessentially American organizations - the Boy Scouts - is under siege ... again.

Skip to next paragraph

Three months after the Boy Scouts of America won a US Supreme Court ruling permitting the private group to exclude homosexuals as scoutmasters, gay-rights groups across the nation are working to paint the 6 million-strong organization as a bastion of bigots undeserving of community support.

While the campaign is applying pressure in a few areas, it is still too early to determine whether the effort will substantially undercut the Boy Scouts' ability to raise funds, recruit new members, and maintain its once-universal image as a wholesome training ground for future leaders.

If successful, the campaign could force up to 1 million Boy Scouts in 19,000 troops, who meet in public schools or community centers, to find private, nongovernmental sponsors or disband. The remaining 65 percent of troops are sponsored by religious organizations.

Boy Scouts spokesman Gregg Shields says the organization has been fighting in court to protect its values and standards from outside interference for 20 years. He says the Scouts' leadership isn't about to back down now and that the vast majority of Scouts and their parents have decided to remain in scouting.

"We are in virtually every community in America," says Mr. Shields, who adds that youth recruitment grew 4.2 percent during the past year - a period in which the Scouts' antigay policy was headline news nationwide. "We've heard tremendous expressions of support from most of the communities we operate in."

On the other side, gay activists say they are gaining momentum in questioning the motives and policies of the Boy Scouts' leadership.

Some parents are withdrawing their sons from scouting, they say, though there are no firm estimates of how many.

In addition, the Texas-based organization is facing critical questions posed by some local school boards, elected officials, charity administrators, and corporate donors. They want to know why they should continue to support the Boy Scouts in light of a national policy that discriminates against gay men and boys who want to join the Scouts.

The antigay policy runs counter to laws and policies adopted in some states and localities that bar discrimination based on sexual preference.

Donors and public officials are facing a difficult dilemma. They are seeking to balance their desire not to support discrimination against their desire not to hurt tens of thousands of local boys who benefit from Scouting programs and have nothing to do with setting the group's national policies.

At the center of the controversy is a rule enacted by the Boy Scouts' executive board that bars men and boys who are openly homosexual from membership. The board says gay men do not offer the kind of role model they seek to project in Scouting. And they argue that as a private organization, they have a First Amendment right to rely on moral criteria of their own choosing to select leaders.

The US Supreme Court agreed in a 5-to-4 ruling in June.

It marked a setback for those working to end discrimination against gays. But it also marked the beginning of a second campaign by gay activists, aimed at eliminating all public support and special treatment granted to the Scouts.